Posted on 05/24/2011 8:56:17 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Ahhh. You base these assumptions on your careful studying of "her record."
That being the factual case, surely you can tell us what you found in studying "her record" that shows she is:
1) Unqualified.
2) Unelectable.
3) Unable to beat Obama.
I sincerely appreciate your logical and verifiable approach to this. Sway the vote to your camp. Explain those three little points up above, which we believe when you tell us you arrived at by reviewing "her record."
What in "her record" proved to you she is "unqualified?"
What in "her record" proved to you she is "unqelectable?"
What in "her record" proved to you she "cannot beat Obama?"
Hey Mr. Logical excuse-master, we're waiting. What's the problem? You claim to have based these sound conclusions based upon your careful study of her record. So give.
Unless, of course, you're as full of crap as a Christmas goose. Just another lying, excuse making, Anti-Palin weasel with no basis for your buffoonery except your illogical, ill-informed prejudice.
But that's not the case at all, right? You can easily answer these three litlle questions, because you've studied her record. Right?
We're still waiting. And waiting.
;-\
I did not experience the racism from that tool. All I ever got were childish hate filled insults when I called him out for his irrational hate on Palin. I don’t mind the hate if you can back it up with facts and figures, but it was always insults and innuendo. Which was eventually his downfall.
After reading that line about voices, I immediately thought of him. Had the same tone.
ROFLMAO!! Wow! I can hear it now... "Excuse me, Mr. Foreign Policy Advisor, why didn't you prepare Governor Palin for the trick question about the Third Duke of Sussex?"
Tell me you're joking. Please. Get a grip. You sound like Bogart as Captain Queeg in "The Cain Mutiny": "Nobody leaves 'til we find out who took the strawberries!"
If our Gov't is reading these posts, the men in the White Coats just may be paying you a visit, Cap'n. For your own safety.
LMAO
8^D
Pissant, is that you? :O
Bikk
And who are you?
LOL!! That’s what I said ;)
Bikk
Yep. Well whoever that was got banned/suspended for their effort earlier today. :)
Plodding, inept, unfunny, and worthless.
It is a real shame that FR has so many of the likes of you on the site.
Blaaaa bla blaaaa bla bla blaaablaa.
Bla.
Your lips are moving, but absolutely nothing comes out.
I am pretty sure she wont actually run for president 2012 now. Yes, I agree she is sending out the messages to the MSM that she is going to (really) run , but in the end she will announce some excuse for not running. If you really believe that is not possible, then what will you say if it was to happen? How could it be explained?
Even with the bus tour? It’s all a game to fool people over just for the fun of it ?
Yes, I see exactly what you mean. It would have to be a huge hoax by her if she doesn't actually run for president 2012. You are a smart guy and sound very honest.
Opinions certainly do vary significantly.
Like I said, I wouldn’t be so quick to write her off. I have no idea if she would win or lose; I just know she has a hyooooge following and can fire-up supporters like no-one in recent GOP history. Palin is a candidate that appears to have a knack for successfully defying conventional wisdom, much to the frustration of her steadfast detractors.
As I doubt you would suggest she should not be allowed to run, I say let everyone who wants to compete in the primaries show us what they have and then let the voters decide.
__________________________________________
It's not a matter of being "allowed" to run, I don't think along those lines.
Once she does decide (if) then she will be forced (like everyone else in the race) to face interviewers and audiences that are not her choir. She will have to adress her record rather than slide by on tweets, facebook posts and FOX interviews.
The financial disaster she caused in Wasilla due to lack of executive acumen, her windfall profits tax on oil, her assignment (and praise) of a Planned Parenthood operative to the Alaska SC, her lack of a true Pro-Life position (she keeps using the word 'choice' and states only her 'personal' view), her praise for public sector unions in her Wisconsin speech, her "pathway to citizenship" (iow - amnesty) position on illegals and the big-daddy -- her resignation will all be put to her for answers.
My genuine belief since July 2009 is that she is not electable. She can't get the 65-70 million American voters she would need (that's right - at least 65,000,000). I don't care if she triples her FB friends or if the number of Freeper acolytes increases tenfold...she will not get the tens of millions MOR voters needed to beat obama.
If we nominate her we are toast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.