To: Pining_4_TX
So, in essence they are trying to create another chamber within the Congress. I think this would take an amendment to the Constitution if I am thinking correctly.
11 posted on
08/01/2011 12:46:58 PM PDT by
Bruinator
(God is Great.... God is Good....Evil is Real.)
To: Bruinator
15 posted on
08/01/2011 12:48:19 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
To: Bruinator
The whole idea is manifestly UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Took a bunch of Democrats with totalitaritarian leanings to come up with something like that. We need their names.
26 posted on
08/01/2011 12:57:59 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Bruinator
The whole idea is manifestly UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Took a bunch of Democrats with totalitaritarian leanings to come up with something like that. We need their names.
27 posted on
08/01/2011 12:58:07 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Bruinator
I think this would take an amendment to the Constitution You're absolutely right! What has my brain (such as it is) spinning is the sudden spate of such extra-Constitutional brainf*rts floating one after another out of the quagmire of the Congressional imagination. They seem to think they can just make it up as they go along... ('scuse the language, not my usual style)
56 posted on
08/01/2011 2:27:32 PM PDT by
ArmyTeach
(Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... USS Iowa 61)
To: Bruinator
I agree with you. I think this super committee is completely unconstitutional.
57 posted on
08/01/2011 2:27:45 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Bruinator
Unless we let them get away with it. They have no respect
for the Constitution, none. BTW, both the English Civil
War and the French Revolution began over state finance
issues.
71 posted on
08/01/2011 9:29:14 PM PDT by
cycjec
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson