This is NOT an interesting political or philosophical gesture. It is disloyalty, oath breaking and lawlessness. Pure and simple.
He is defending the constitution from both a foreign and domestic enemy. You are advocating a halt to action against the enemy, and you accuse HIM of being disloyal? Have we gone to "Newspeak" already? You have it completely backwards. The entire Military should have risen en masse to demand proof when none was forthcoming.
This is the second comment of this nature you've made.
Promoting a military coup on FR is frowned upon by management...perhaps you need to revise and extend your remarks...or find a birther website where they tolerate that kind of nonsense.
Speaking of having it entirely bass-ackwards ...
The US Military is SUPPOSED to be apolitical, ‘detached’ if you will, from the political operations of the government. Any assertion of political interest or interference with the operation of the political process — you know, elections, legislation, law enforcement, things like that — would be CONTRARY to their role as explicitly defined in the Constitution and in such places as the Posse Comitatus and Insurrection Acts.
Fortunately, throughout our history, the Military has tended to act with a clear perception of and loyalty TO that concept — this despite profound provocations like The Civil War, the Bonus Army marchers and 9/11. You ought to learn enough about what you’re arguing to make more sense ...
One Man’s Opinion
21stCenturion
FReepers DO NOT support insurrection. Get lost. You're not FReeper material.
“The entire Military should have risen en masse to demand proof when none was forthcoming.”
Yes, it is quite easy to call for other people to put their; blood, life, family, property, job and freedom on the line for a coup d’état.