To: mad_as_he$$
An open border means poverty has given way to opportunity, and Mexicos citizens do not feel compelled to cross the border to find that opportunity.It means we have addressed pollution concerns, made substantial progress in stopping the spread of disease, and rid our crossings of illicit drug smuggling activity. Clearly we have a long way to go in addressing those issues
I'd be for open-borders too, IF ONLY...
To: TexasCajun; SoConPubbie
Exactly!
In his scenario Perry described a Mexico totally unlike the current one. One that if it ever comes to be won't be in the lifetime of our children or our children's children. Those are conditions that SoConPubbie simply chooses to ignore...
or maybe he doesn't understand qualified language.
55 posted on
08/16/2011 8:58:53 AM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(Perry 2012! A Conservative who can win!)
To: TexasCajun
Well I wouldn’t. Mexico can keep it’s trash.
To: TexasCajun
I read all the dissent in this thread and I see valid points on both sides. Ten years ago, the qualifier, he's never said otherwise, blah blah blah. What I want to know is his position on the borders
today.
My vote will go to the candidate who promises to build walls and post armed guards, starting the day after he/she takes oath. NOT ONE VOTE for any candidate who sympathizes with foreign invaders.
79 posted on
08/16/2011 10:01:28 AM PDT by
Mich Patriot
(A government agency is the closest thing to eternal life you'll ever see on Earth. RReagan)
To: TexasCajun
I'd be for open-borders too, IF ONLY... Yeah if only money grew on trees and rivers where filled with wine...
183 posted on
08/27/2011 12:22:05 PM PDT by
Niteflyr
("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson