Posted on 08/16/2011 11:40:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
I happened upon Rick Perrys speech this weekend in a manner typical of myself. I had just turned the TV on to program my DVR to record some obscure foreign cultural something-or-other when the Texas governor appeared onscreen to announce his candidacy for president. I had never seen Perry speak before. Id asked my knowledgeable friends about him. Some loved him; some said he was a twit. I sat down to watch to see for myself. Here is what I saw.
The speech started out uncomfortably. I was put off by the mawkish tribute to the fallen Navy SEALs at the beginning. Our hallowed dead are worthy of every honor, but there was something ever-so-slightly unpleasant about a politician attempting to harness our grief and pride in order to serve a moment of career self-advancement.
Then came Perrys life story. His childhood on a cotton farm in the tiny town of Paint Creek, Texas; his wooing of the childhood sweetheart who became his wife; his graduation from Texas A&M; his stint in the Air Force. I hadnt heard it before and was interested and favorably impressed.
Next there was the red meat indictment of the current administration for its abominable failure on almost every score. I like red meat as much as the next man and I joined the crowds applause from my sofa. After all, Barack Obamas failure is so abysmal and complete that hes turned even the killing of Osama bin Laden into an asterisk. It cant be told often enough.
AP photo composite from Politico.
But then came something better, something really good. Perry, whose state holds ten percent of the countrys population and yet is responsible for more than 40 percent of new American jobs created since June 2009, began to talk more or less specifically about his approach to the economy. Ticking off four goals on his fingers controlled spending, low taxes, fair and simple regulations, and tort reform he outlined his accomplishments in Texas and his plans for the nation.
With this, the Perry speech began to lift off and become truly elegant and excellent. It was a repudiation not merely of Barack Obama and his horrible record, but of the underlying ideas that guide and motivate them. This is what we need. This is what we have to have. We need smart politics sure. We need a reasonably appealing and scandal-free candidate of course. But if that candidate is not willing to speak out loud and bold against Obamas ideas and in favor of the ideas of the American founders then we cannot win the minds of the people for the business that has to be done. Beyond pat phrases like big government, and low taxes, and balanced budget, we conservatives have got to let people know what we stand for and why. Perry did that he made a beginning anyway. And he made it clear hes not afraid to say much more.
Ill promise you this, Perry said, winding up to his peroration:
Ill work every day to make Washington, D.C. as inconsequential in your life as I can.
When I heard that, my heart actually stirred. Now there there is hope and change I can believe in.
Perrys speech was good. It was damned good. I thought a chill wind of fear must have blown through this miserable excuse for a White House when they heard it. Perry still faces a lot of obstacles: primaries, unfair media coverage and the dirt-digging of the opposition. But his ideas are right and the lefts are wrong his ideas work and theirs dont his ideas tend toward freedom, theirs toward stagnation and collapse.
If he can continue to make that case as forcefully as he did this weekend, hes in with a chance.
ALSO READ: Agnostics for Perry
Good summary. I didn’t actually hear his speech... just read about it (like your summary). I like what I’m hearing, though a little troubled at past associations and positions (Al Gore, Immigration). I’m still on the fence (and waiting for Sarah)... but I’ll reserve judgement until I see more. His calling the QEs what they are was another good stroke...
I had the same reaction that the writer did to this moment, and the speech overall. However, I think if you look at the speech as a whole, I think Perry was trying to make the point that he does not hate America, unlike the current occupant. I can't recall Obama having much to say about the SEALs that died in that copter crash, although I'm sure he issued some acknowledgement of it. But that is Obama, just going through the motions to make Americans think he actually cares about the military when he and his kind despise the military.
“Ill promise you this, Perry said, winding up to his peroration:
Ill work every day to make Washington, D.C. as inconsequential in your life as I can.
When I heard that, my heart actually stirred. Now there there is hope and change I can believe in.”
Which is why in early 2007 he signed an executive order as Governor of Texas mandating that 12-year-old girls in Texas be given the highly controversial vaccine Gardasil? THAT kind of “inconsequential”?
That’s because he’s from Texas. We honor our active and veteran military in ways that I have never seen in the rest of the country. You have to see a Texas gathering to really dial into it.
I thought it was typical political boilerplate. Why do people have this need to fall in love with political candidates? Why can’t they just pick the best one, but continue to think rationally? Why does it have to be a man-crush? The grandiosity is sickening.
He admits that was a mistake
He admits that was a mistake
There mere fact that he ever thought it was a good idea is bad news. That is an unforgiveable order he gave. Who the Hell ever thinks that they should have the power to intrude on other peoples bodies???
If Obama came out right now and said he thinks his DeathCare was a mistake would you be so quick to forgive him? I sure as Hell wouldn’t.
IIRC, there was also an "opt out" provision.
Yeah, you had to beg. Nice. Begging for your rights as a human.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.