Posted on 08/19/2011 11:14:36 PM PDT by Tempest
While Perry is staking his campaign on Texas being the top net jobs creator, Perrys version of Texas being Open for Business isnt about low taxes and less regulation as much as it is about doing business with foreign companies, including selling off Texas sovereign land and public assets to foreign creditors, an issue which Perrys first television ad uses to take aim at President Obama.
A recent Washington Post article documents Perrys work to get Chinese government-owned telecommunications company Huawei, to base its U.S. operations in Texas, a company that the U.S. government has deemed a threat to national security noting that three times since 2008, a U.S. government security panel has blocked Huawei from acquiring or partnering with U.S. companies because of concerns that secrets could be leaked to Chinas government or military.
Perrys coziness with the Chinese and foreign investors exposes a huge weakness in his right flank illegal immigration and open borders. The Trans Texas Corridor has been linked to the global plan to economically integrate North America, with the eventual goal of a common security perimeter modeled after the European Union. Perry ushered in in-state tuition for illegals and has long been an obstacle to immigration reform or any Arizona-style immigration law.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
good post!
see post 148
see post 151
See post 151
So, I guess Goldman’s didn’t like Kerry as much as Bush, but at the same time Bush and Perry were not friendly, either.
Goldman Sachs is very much in the hands of the Democrat party, though. They are heavily involved with most of the crony capitalist projects of the Obama administration, especially anything that has to do with trade with China.
Earlier today, we read that Goldman Sachs is helping to fund some George Soros media outlet in Texas that is anti-Perry.
And a peer of mine at work was a strong, healthy woman with an 18 month-old. She got the flu. By the time the flu was over, she also had diabetes and can have no more children.
Bad things happen. Very, very, very, few people have the reactions to the flu or to DPT that my peer and your nephew had. Life in an imperfect world.
You have a way of stretching and exaggerating that would make Chris Matthews envious.
Which candidate do you support?
What I was trying to get across to that pinhead name caller was the definition of Neocon that the Daddy of all Neocons, Irving Kristol, came up with himself.
Or to put it another way: Neocons are in their hearts; Still Liberals. And Big Government Liberals at that. The only thing they are 'Neo' (new) at is the 'con' part. And said 'con' part is their 'Neo' (cough-bs) *stance* on Defense. But therein lies the rub.
A Neocon's idea of what should be defended is not necessarily what really is in the best interest of the United States. And if it wasn't for the influence of the Neocons by their powerful Lobbying groups, and through infiltration of the US government - like Doug Feith, it normally wouldn't even make it in the top five things we'd be concerned about as a nation regarding our own security.
That's what I was attempting to get across about 'Neocons'.
An aside: I don''t know when Irving Kristol came up with his 'Neocon' definition (didn't Google it). But iirc historically the first 'Liberal who went con', aka: became a Neocon, was Scoop Jackson. And his 'Neocon' Defense stance was regarding the USSR. So maybe Scoop Jackson is the father of Neocons, not Irving Kristol? [would that make little Billy cry :-)]
The pinkneos blow whichever way the Beltway Winds are blowing-----spewing their elitist Endless War thingy, co-opting whoever's in power.
Perry's sex life is really improving as the pukeneos line up under his desk.....probably had to install a Take-A-Number machine to control the neo traffic. Here's hoping Perry's got the stamina for all the lewinskys coming his way (/snix).
Yes. What you said :-)
One of the most clever shows on the squawk box, I tell you what. :)
Actually, yes. A thousand girls from the age of 9-15 received the vaccine. These are numbers from the reports that the researchers and the FDA gave to the FDA Vaccine Research Committee.
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/transcripts/2006-4222t1.pdf
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/AcipMinJun06_FB100506_174608_7.pdf
The children tolerated the vaccine with fewer adverse effects and had a higher antibody response than older subjects.
OK we see who you are against....... now tell us who you are for!
John Bolton has attended those Bilderberg meetings, too. Of course he’s a “neo-con,” right?
That’s a useless google search with hits all over the place.
It’s a matter of simple logic: roads and buildings need to be built, managed and maintained. Either the government grows (and taxes) in order to hire all the people and do all the work, or the job is put out to bid.
Someone’s going to win the bid.
Equal rights never meant the right to equal outcome.
Another dead-link-useless-source.
Association does not equal causation and outcome does not prove intent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.