Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bayouranger

It amuses me that these poseurs express themselves in Spanish rather than Nahuatl.


5 posted on 08/30/2011 9:30:17 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Psalm 144
They're primarily of European ancestry. Maybe a couple of Indians in the woodpile but not as many as they want you to believe.

The reason they look so much like Arabs and North Africans is their ancestors invaded Spain.

Now, regarding lands held by Spain, whatever these pukes tell you about a treaty between Mexico and Spain, Philippe I/II as well as Philippe II/III called the rest of the area North of Mexico the Kingdom of New Mexico ~ it had a separate legal existence in the eyes of its owners. It first began official settlement in 1598, just like Nova Scotia, and Virginia (this was prior to the more formal declaration of the Treaty of London (1604) but consistent with the wishes of Philippe II/III who succeeded his father Philippe I/II who died that year.)

Events on the ground do not give rise to any belief that Mexico, as a sovereign state, had lawful title to the Kingdom of New Mexico ~ particularly when that claim is tied in with pre-existing "native claims". If anything, the evidence is that "natives" from the Valley of Mexico invaded, murdered and ate many natives of both New Mexico and Arizona OVER THEIR OBJECTIONS.

Morality itself is against the Mexican claim.

28 posted on 08/30/2011 9:42:51 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Psalm 144
" ... that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” .... to take back the lands of the Southwest that were stolen from our Mexican ancestors." .... Article

It amuses me that these poseurs express themselves in Spanish rather than Nahuatl. .... Psalm 144

Exactly. They are not "Latinos". They are "Mexicans". A true "Hispano" or "Latino" visitor in Mexico gets a lot of whining about "how the European Spaniards conquered our land".

In Spanish-speaking countries, "Hispano" (from the Roman province of Hispania) means "relating to Spain itself".

Hispania and "Hispano" are to Spain as Britannia and "British" are to Britain.

In Spanish-speaking countries, "Latino" is a general term that includes all speakers of all Latin based languages. So, the term also includes the French, the Italians, the Portuguese, the Brazilians, etc.

At least the Mexican activists who drew up this poster got it correctly:

The irony of the entire Aztlan ideology is that the descendents of the Mayans and the Aztecs did not originally conquer what is now Texas, California, New Mexico and Arizona from the native tribes. The European Spaniards did.

If there is any ancestral claim to what is now the American Southwest, that claim belongs to the descendants of the local Native American tribes and not to the descendants of the Mexican tribes from Central Mexico or the Yucatan.

71 posted on 08/30/2011 10:14:35 AM PDT by Polybius (Defeating Obama is Priority Number One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Psalm 144

I’ve had that discussion with many of my students. They don’t seem to grasp that the spanish they proudly speak is the language imposed on them by their European conquerers.


134 posted on 08/30/2011 11:59:39 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Psalm 144

Of course! They unknowingly speak the language of their conquerors.....they have eschewed formal education for a hundred or more years; they eventually will succumb to the same linguistic fate when they try the bullshit bravodo they speak of - this time, it will be English their progeny speaks.


177 posted on 08/30/2011 3:10:03 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson