Squeeky, that case is from the Court of Appeals in Indiana.
You may certainly take the stance that the US Supreme Court case re: Minor does not define “natural born citizen.” And I would argue the exact opposite.
But using an Indiana case to prove your point is weak.
It’s a free country and you can have whatever opinion you want, but when you give legal advice about conservatives like Rubio and Jindle being able to run for office, then you have to make sure you are not spreading false and bad legal advice stuff. Sooo, when a court says something, that is what the law is even if you don’t agree with it. If you want to be honest, then you need to let everybody know that how you are interpreting stuff is completely different from how most people read it and how the courts are interpreting it. Because if you read the Indiana court stuff, those people said the same stuff all you Vattle Birthers are, that natural born people had to have two citizen parents, and they lost. I don’t think that Rubio and Jindle are going to appreciate you spreading these things that are just made up. Plus, it is not nice to other conservatives.