and everyone knows it!!!
Posted on 09/26/2011 12:43:52 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
Cain
Perry is in trouble because he demonstrated himself to be not all that much different the Romney. Rather then be an actual Conservative leader, Perry has exposed himself as yet another Establishment empty suit, say anything political pander and crony capitalist.
IMO Perry is not.
She’s ineluctable.
Herman is the best choice, and he is an actual candidate.
True enough. People are making a mistake in counting Bachmann out and Santorum wouldn’t cause me a great deal of pain voting for him.
I like Cain but I prefer the Tina Fey look-a-like....
JMO....
I see you’ve found yet another thread to talk up Perry. /s
I’m not sure I trust Perry. I know I don’t trust Romney. Cain seems like a decent person and seems authentically American - self-reliant, concerned about individual rights. And unless Sarah declares, there’s no reason to discuss her here.
And quite frankly endorsements like the one Perry received today from southern agriculture commissioners are helpful. If you look at the wording of the statements the “tools and resources” fits into the RINO narrative of more illegal labor and farm subsidies. Not the direction we need to go as a nation.
Perhaps you might want to reconsider you emotion based attachment to Perry rather then objecting to the truth being spoken.
Perry has my vote if he is the nominee. Perhaps not my enthusiasm but at least my vote. Romney will not get my vote. I will write in Palin before I cast a vote for that big-government ObamaCare-loving RINO from Massachusetts. I don’t see any comparison at all between the two.
I'm thinking we might not want to ask Maxine.
I have to admit that Sarah’s ‘wait and see’ strategy is looking better every day. If she jumps in now she will face the rapidly fading Bachmann, a highly damaged Perry and a Cain who is an unknown to half the population.
Now that’s a way more favorable circumstance than she would have been faced with if she had entered the race earlier. Plus she has missed 3 debates where it is certain that she would have shared that Pinata with Perry.
Well the title is a lie. Only two candidates are conservative on the list. Palin and Cain. I love this question that NO ONE will answer..... Perry has been bashing Obama on immigration like Obama bashes Bush over economy....the two of them are awfully similar. Blame others. Also I find it hilarious how Perry complains about Obama not doing anything for immigration but he has been gov for 11 years.....not a peep about immigration the other 9 years he has been in office. That is VERY telling.
and everyone knows it!!!
Bachmann?
Look, Perry is a good man, he just has screwed up on the immigration issue.
He has to change his policies.
Palin isn’t in the race.
Cain is a good conservative man. He could conceivably take the race issue away from Hussein the fascist.
I’ve always pretty much agreed with Cain never gave him much chance to break though the crowd. He is now in the spotlight, and that’s a credit to his ability to live and speak his basic principles, and his ability to articulate them (hmmm...he’s starting to remind me of Reagan).
“Bachmann and Santorum are perfectly acceptable as well.”
They are acceptable due to their conservative ideology. But, I think the Cain, Palin, and Perry are the three with the best chance of gaining the nomination at this point.
Things could change in time, but Bachmann’s campaign is in bigger free fall than Perry. Santorum, is doing better and I enjoy listening to him talk about foreign policy.
But, Cain has the breakout momentum right now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.