Skip to comments.Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Birth Certificate: Fox News Will Be In Attendance
Posted on 10/07/2011 6:24:48 PM PDT by GregNH
From attorney Orly Taitz: Update! My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am. If you are a resident of Honolulu or if you are visiting Honolulu on October 12th and you are a supporter of mine, please, come to the hearing to support me. First circuit court of HI, Judge Rhonda Nishimura, 777 Punchbowl str., Honolulu, HI, October 12th 8:30 am.
This case was filed against the registrar Alvin Onaka and Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, seeking access to the original birth certificate of Barack Obama for expert examination.
If you are a tea party member in HI, please, relate this message to the Tea Party members, Republican party members or any decent resident of HI, who wants the truth and justice to prevail. Please, relate this message to the local media.
FOX reporter will be in the courtroom during October 12th hearing in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am and will be over at 8:32 am.
Meh. As an attorney I find this entire issue pretty meaningless and remain utterly unconvinced of the “evidence”.
As an attorney you said then why do you say this as you must know as an attorney court is not meaningless.
Have you seen all the evidence too like you say you have?
Really n00b? As a self admitted attorney, I find you to have about a 98% likelyhood of being a...
Well, let me just say “John Edwards”.
I’ve always contented that it is less about the birth certificate than it is about ObaMao and his sponsors proving they can circumvent the constitution and thumb their noses at us.
LOL. Well, at least only 2 minutes of time would be wasted on an issue that is never going anywhere.
Maybe. You still manage to make it to comment #4 on this thread that you think is on a meaningless topic.
I don’t know what to think. So, I appreciate Ms. Taitz’ efforts to clarify things.
have you looked at the photoshopped resume? on wnd.
the larger question is,
all presidential candidates should be vetted by the media.
obama was not.
we know more about sarah palin’s lipstick shades than we do about mr and mrs obama’s fake social security numbers.
“LOL. Well, at least only 2 minutes of time would be wasted on an issue that is never going anywhere.”
It’ll get lots of play if Soros and HRC decide it’s time for Zero to go.
Shouldn’t the hearing be in Kenya?
I’m an attorney too and unlike you I find the evidence attention-getting and the legal issues fascinating. Some enterprisimg 2L on law review could really have some fun doing a thorough exploration of the standing problem. Maybe someone already has. I haven’t poked around in the journals lately. Maybe there’s a CLE that would cover it. Or not. But they are doing more out of the box stuff. Which is good, because I nearly fell asleep during my estates CLE. Just sayin...
Taitz’s strategy all along was to file this case in HI State Court and if thrown out appeal with the 9th Circuit where she already has one case pending (conjoin the cases?). Either way it will not be over in 2 minutes as someone on this thread has claimed...
Sure n00b, whatever you say.
God be with her.
Amazing how those idiots are out protesting Wall St., yet without batting an eye hand the keys to the WH to someone with so many unanswered questions about his life and background.
Hawaii Freeper ping
Well, there is no way Dr. Taitz can lose here, because she either gets what she wants, or she is once again pushed away by all that technical law stuff. Either way, she lives to fight another day!!! If Obama and the Obots are stupid enough not to go to court and put an end to this, it will just be one more win in the Court of Human Opinion.
Thank you for the Ping... It makes me think of visiting the Islands again. The Shave ice, the Mauna Pua, the Saimin... Kalua pig right out of the ground, the potato salad, the fresh Poi.... Hawaiians do know how to eat!
HAHAHAHAHA Brilliant come back. lol I give ya that one.
That’s a response? You do realize its people like you that make us all look bad.
Yeah, different strokes as they say. I just dn’t see it.
Oh god, I tell ya what I slept through, the Fed Tax portion of BARBRI. Talk about a SNOOOOOOOOOZER.
And, yeah ... CLEs are some good sleeping time. The best I ever took though was early in my career by a Federal Court District Judge that was simply entitled, “how to try a case”. I settled in, ready to snooze and was riveted the entire time. Changed the way I approached litigation and I was so much better as a result. Was a two day seminar ... on the weekend, and I still looked forward to going.
Always nice o meet a fellow “legal traveler”. =)
WElcome to FR what was your prior name, your response sounds very familiar...
The evidence is on the prosecution ... those trying to prove a point. I have yet to see any worth a piss.
Now doing misunderstand me, Obama is about the worst thing for our Nation, but this issue is without evidence and borders on the silly.
Back atcha crickets.
I know more about an upside down rock Rick Perry walked by on his way to shoot Bambi than I do about Obama's college record.
The Prosecution will come later during Fast & Furious conclusion.
Good post, Ken. Sad but oh so true.
In that I mean samplings of the ink and so on are easily taken without damage. Other than that, a logical explanation should be forthcoming. Nobody is going to be hung over it, (Hopefully),
I was specifically using a crim law metaphor. All those years as a Prosecutor I suppose.
Yeah I wish in Fast and Furious. Not holding my breath though.
Metaphor: Not found in Black's Law Dictionary.
lol They need an update
so unless you have evidence its nothing? How many cases start without admissible evidence and end up with convictions or judgements? Ever hear of investigations and discovery? Where does evidence come from? Are you a reasonable person who can’t see anything wrong?
That is absolutely correct. Unless you have evidence, it is nothing. When an investigator came to me with facts, evidence, he had to have something concrete. I’ve seen neigh unto nothing on this issue to convince me it is anything more than a canard. It is tilting at windmills.
No cases start without admissible evidence.
Discovery can not be a fishing expedition. It must be based be show to reasonably appear to lead to admissible evidence. Mere assertion means nothing. And you can not have discovery absent a pending suit (except in the rarest of circumstances)
Evidence comes from facts, not conjecture or supposition.
I don’t understand your last question.
I dont understand your last question.
You just answered it, you are not acting like a reasonable person, rather one with an particular bent...your ignore the known information and hide behind what is not yet revealed...do you want the truth or are you happy to continue to be ignorant and not pursue the truth? According to your comments you are not interested in the truth and accept the hiding of facts as nothing to see. So once again what was your prior name on FR?
Were you a Assistant to Roy Bean?
And, yet again, I don’t understand your last question.
HAHAHAHAHA God knows I’m just about old enough.
Who's "us"? Noob.
You wanna disagree with me, have at it. I respect that. But if you wanna be treated like an adult and be taken seriously as an adult, act the part. Musing on whether or not I “scratch my balls” doesn’t sell that adult thing too well.
Whenever we have cogent discussions on the issue, it just takes one post like yours for us to be labeled as drooling morons.
I’m not a lawyer, but I think the trajectory to a federal Circuit Court is from a federal District Court. You have to begin at the District Court level, claiming violations of federal law. Then, if you lose there, you go to the appeals court, I don’t think one goes from a municipal or state court to a federal appeals court, with the exception of the DC Court of Appeals, and then IIRC it’s straight to SCOTUS.
Some have in their minds they are so tuff when we spew nonsense.
Keep blathering. We know what you are.
You could be right, but I think that there will be a lot of voters come election day Nov. 2012 who will vote against Obama because of the way Obama has been so secretive about his background during the 2012 presidential campaign.
For instance, it has been nearly six months since Obama released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, yet Kapiolani Hospital has not said one word to verify that Obama was born there as it is stated on the long form birth certificate.
It would take a simple phone call from the President of the United States to Kapiolani officials---and put a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation---for those officials to verify tomorrow that Obama was indeed born there, for those officials to allow reporters to examine Obama's records, and for the officials to point out the room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961, but Kapiolani and Obama are conspicuously silent. Why is that?
Could the answer be a simple one: Kapiolani officials are conspicuously silent because Obama was not born there as Obama claims, so there are no Obama records for anyone to look at, and there is no hospital room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.