Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Birth Certificate: Fox News Will Be In Attendance
BirtherReport.com ^ | 10/07/2011 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 10/07/2011 6:24:48 PM PDT by GregNH

From attorney Orly Taitz: Update! My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am. If you are a resident of Honolulu or if you are visiting Honolulu on October 12th and you are a supporter of mine, please, come to the hearing to support me. First circuit court of HI, Judge Rhonda Nishimura, 777 Punchbowl str., Honolulu, HI, October 12th 8:30 am.

This case was filed against the registrar Alvin Onaka and Director of Health Loretta Fuddy, seeking access to the original birth certificate of Barack Obama for expert examination.

If you are a tea party member in HI, please, relate this message to the Tea Party members, Republican party members or any decent resident of HI, who wants the truth and justice to prevail. Please, relate this message to the local media.

FOX reporter will be in the courtroom during October 12th hearing in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; hopespringseternal; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; taitz; taitzvfuddyonaka; thistimeforsure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-162 next last
Just an update
1 posted on 10/07/2011 6:24:54 PM PDT by GregNH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GregNH

good.


2 posted on 10/07/2011 6:27:57 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am and will be over at 8:32 am.


3 posted on 10/07/2011 6:35:15 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Meh. As an attorney I find this entire issue pretty meaningless and remain utterly unconvinced of the “evidence”.


4 posted on 10/07/2011 6:38:58 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

good.


5 posted on 10/07/2011 6:41:29 PM PDT by manc (Beckett08 an anti war Answer troll who had to re-register. don't feed the troll, they'll send PM's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

As an attorney you said then why do you say this as you must know as an attorney court is not meaningless.

Have you seen all the evidence too like you say you have?


6 posted on 10/07/2011 6:44:07 PM PDT by manc (Beckett08 an anti war Answer troll who had to re-register. don't feed the troll, they'll send PM's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Really n00b? As a self admitted attorney, I find you to have about a 98% likelyhood of being a...

Well, let me just say “John Edwards”.


7 posted on 10/07/2011 6:44:15 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

I’ve always contented that it is less about the birth certificate than it is about ObaMao and his sponsors proving they can circumvent the constitution and thumb their noses at us.


8 posted on 10/07/2011 6:45:39 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
My hearing in HI, in Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka is in 5 days, October 12th, 8:30 am and will be over at 8:32 am.

LOL. Well, at least only 2 minutes of time would be wasted on an issue that is never going anywhere.

9 posted on 10/07/2011 6:46:55 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Maybe. You still manage to make it to comment #4 on this thread that you think is on a meaningless topic.

I don’t know what to think. So, I appreciate Ms. Taitz’ efforts to clarify things.


10 posted on 10/07/2011 6:50:53 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

have you looked at the photoshopped resume? on wnd.

the larger question is,

all presidential candidates should be vetted by the media.

obama was not.

we know more about sarah palin’s lipstick shades than we do about mr and mrs obama’s fake social security numbers.


11 posted on 10/07/2011 6:53:30 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“LOL. Well, at least only 2 minutes of time would be wasted on an issue that is never going anywhere.”

It’ll get lots of play if Soros and HRC decide it’s time for Zero to go.


12 posted on 10/07/2011 6:54:03 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Shouldn’t the hearing be in Kenya?


13 posted on 10/07/2011 6:57:56 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Interesting thought.


14 posted on 10/07/2011 7:03:32 PM PDT by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I’m an attorney too and unlike you I find the evidence attention-getting and the legal issues fascinating. Some enterprisimg 2L on law review could really have some fun doing a thorough exploration of the standing problem. Maybe someone already has. I haven’t poked around in the journals lately. Maybe there’s a CLE that would cover it. Or not. But they are doing more out of the box stuff. Which is good, because I nearly fell asleep during my estates CLE. Just sayin...


15 posted on 10/07/2011 7:08:50 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooby


16 posted on 10/07/2011 7:20:28 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Springfield Reformer; All

Taitz’s strategy all along was to file this case in HI State Court and if thrown out appeal with the 9th Circuit where she already has one case pending (conjoin the cases?). Either way it will not be over in 2 minutes as someone on this thread has claimed...


18 posted on 10/07/2011 7:27:04 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Sure n00b, whatever you say.


19 posted on 10/07/2011 7:32:11 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; Springfield Reformer; LucyT; Danae
Taitz’s strategy all along was to file this case in HI State Court and if thrown out appeal with the 9th Circuit where she already has one case pending (conjoin the cases?). Either way it will not be over in 2 minutes as someone on this thread has claimed...

God be with her.

20 posted on 10/07/2011 7:36:13 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Amazing how those idiots are out protesting Wall St., yet without batting an eye hand the keys to the WH to someone with so many unanswered questions about his life and background.


21 posted on 10/07/2011 7:45:26 PM PDT by bgill (There, happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
“That is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection... Overruled.” My Cousin Vinny
22 posted on 10/07/2011 7:48:32 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; steadfastpatriots; BigIsleGal; caisson71; ninja121354; ScottHawaiian; AceAnalyst; drglen; ..

Hawaii Freeper ping


23 posted on 10/07/2011 7:51:24 PM PDT by seekthetruth (We Patriots want a Commander In Chief who STANDS with Our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Well, there is no way Dr. Taitz can lose here, because she either gets what she wants, or she is once again pushed away by all that technical law stuff. Either way, she lives to fight another day!!! If Obama and the Obots are stupid enough not to go to court and put an end to this, it will just be one more win in the Court of Human Opinion.


24 posted on 10/07/2011 8:00:42 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Thank you for the Ping... It makes me think of visiting the Islands again. The Shave ice, the Mauna Pua, the Saimin... Kalua pig right out of the ground, the potato salad, the fresh Poi.... Hawaiians do know how to eat!


25 posted on 10/07/2011 8:02:48 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

HAHAHAHAHA Brilliant come back. lol I give ya that one.


26 posted on 10/07/2011 8:03:59 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: .45ACP CPD

That’s a response? You do realize its people like you that make us all look bad.


27 posted on 10/07/2011 8:05:48 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Yeah, different strokes as they say. I just dn’t see it.

Oh god, I tell ya what I slept through, the Fed Tax portion of BARBRI. Talk about a SNOOOOOOOOOZER.

And, yeah ... CLEs are some good sleeping time. The best I ever took though was early in my career by a Federal Court District Judge that was simply entitled, “how to try a case”. I settled in, ready to snooze and was riveted the entire time. Changed the way I approached litigation and I was so much better as a result. Was a two day seminar ... on the weekend, and I still looked forward to going.

Always nice o meet a fellow “legal traveler”. =)


28 posted on 10/07/2011 8:11:36 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
And?.....Just what “evidence” have you seen? Wow! Aren't you special.

( crickets)

29 posted on 10/07/2011 8:12:30 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

WElcome to FR what was your prior name, your response sounds very familiar...


30 posted on 10/07/2011 8:16:08 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

The evidence is on the prosecution ... those trying to prove a point. I have yet to see any worth a piss.

Now doing misunderstand me, Obama is about the worst thing for our Nation, but this issue is without evidence and borders on the silly.

Back atcha crickets.


31 posted on 10/07/2011 8:26:18 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ken21
we know more about sarah palin’s lipstick shades than we do about mr and mrs obama’s fake social security numbers

I know more about an upside down rock Rick Perry walked by on his way to shoot Bambi than I do about Obama's college record.

32 posted on 10/07/2011 8:32:22 PM PDT by Boojum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
You mean they are releasing another proven, authentic, actual, official, verified, genuine, original, document expert certified, long form copy of the O’s birth certificate. Wow!!! just Wow!!!/s
33 posted on 10/07/2011 8:37:01 PM PDT by Know et al (The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
You must mean the Plaintiff. The Prosecution is for criminal cases.

The Prosecution will come later during Fast & Furious conclusion.

34 posted on 10/07/2011 8:46:43 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Good post, Ken. Sad but oh so true.


35 posted on 10/07/2011 8:50:59 PM PDT by Republic (uhbama sure has brought a grubby cabal of filth into his inner circle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
As purely a matter of interest to any amateur family historian, it all seems so very simple. If the certificate copied on 25th April 2011, happens to have all the characteristics of a document that is fifty years old, then let Orly and company have at it.

In that I mean samplings of the ink and so on are easily taken without damage. Other than that, a logical explanation should be forthcoming. Nobody is going to be hung over it, (Hopefully),

36 posted on 10/07/2011 8:53:47 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

I was specifically using a crim law metaphor. All those years as a Prosecutor I suppose.

Yeah I wish in Fast and Furious. Not holding my breath though.


37 posted on 10/07/2011 8:55:46 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
"specifically using a crim law metaphor"

Metaphor: Not found in Black's Law Dictionary.

38 posted on 10/07/2011 9:01:19 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

lol They need an update


39 posted on 10/07/2011 9:03:11 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

so unless you have evidence its nothing? How many cases start without admissible evidence and end up with convictions or judgements? Ever hear of investigations and discovery? Where does evidence come from? Are you a reasonable person who can’t see anything wrong?


40 posted on 10/07/2011 9:03:23 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

That is absolutely correct. Unless you have evidence, it is nothing. When an investigator came to me with facts, evidence, he had to have something concrete. I’ve seen neigh unto nothing on this issue to convince me it is anything more than a canard. It is tilting at windmills.

No cases start without admissible evidence.

Discovery can not be a fishing expedition. It must be based be show to reasonably appear to lead to admissible evidence. Mere assertion means nothing. And you can not have discovery absent a pending suit (except in the rarest of circumstances)

Evidence comes from facts, not conjecture or supposition.

I don’t understand your last question.


41 posted on 10/07/2011 9:09:35 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I don’t understand your last question.

You just answered it, you are not acting like a reasonable person, rather one with an particular bent...your ignore the known information and hide behind what is not yet revealed...do you want the truth or are you happy to continue to be ignorant and not pursue the truth? According to your comments you are not interested in the truth and accept the hiding of facts as nothing to see. So once again what was your prior name on FR?


42 posted on 10/07/2011 9:16:06 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Were you a Assistant to Roy Bean?


43 posted on 10/07/2011 9:16:54 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

*shrug* ok

And, yet again, I don’t understand your last question.


44 posted on 10/07/2011 9:21:30 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

HAHAHAHAHA God knows I’m just about old enough.


45 posted on 10/07/2011 9:23:08 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
You do realize its people like you that make us all look bad.

Who's "us"? Noob.

46 posted on 10/07/2011 9:24:38 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

We conservatives.

You wanna disagree with me, have at it. I respect that. But if you wanna be treated like an adult and be taken seriously as an adult, act the part. Musing on whether or not I “scratch my balls” doesn’t sell that adult thing too well.

Whenever we have cogent discussions on the issue, it just takes one post like yours for us to be labeled as drooling morons.


47 posted on 10/07/2011 9:33:07 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I’m not a lawyer, but I think the trajectory to a federal Circuit Court is from a federal District Court. You have to begin at the District Court level, claiming violations of federal law. Then, if you lose there, you go to the appeals court, I don’t think one goes from a municipal or state court to a federal appeals court, with the exception of the DC Court of Appeals, and then IIRC it’s straight to SCOTUS.


48 posted on 10/07/2011 9:41:34 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Some have in their minds they are so tuff when we spew nonsense.

Keep blathering. We know what you are.


49 posted on 10/08/2011 1:11:30 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Meh. As an attorney I find this entire issue pretty meaningless and remain utterly unconvinced of the “evidence”.

******

You could be right, but I think that there will be a lot of voters come election day Nov. 2012 who will vote against Obama because of the way Obama has been so secretive about his background during the 2012 presidential campaign.

For instance, it has been nearly six months since Obama released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, yet Kapiolani Hospital has not said one word to verify that Obama was born there as it is stated on the long form birth certificate.

It would take a simple phone call from the President of the United States to Kapiolani officials---and put a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation---for those officials to verify tomorrow that Obama was indeed born there, for those officials to allow reporters to examine Obama's records, and for the officials to point out the room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961, but Kapiolani and Obama are conspicuously silent. Why is that?

Could the answer be a simple one: Kapiolani officials are conspicuously silent because Obama was not born there as Obama claims, so there are no Obama records for anyone to look at, and there is no hospital room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961.

50 posted on 10/08/2011 1:18:20 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson