“Totally false. It simply did not happen. That is why the issue was debated before the Supreme Court with WKA years later. They would not have accepted arguments about it if it had been previously settled.”
Ahh, another classic Obot response from Seizethecarp. The technique is to throw out the impenetrable Wong Kim Ark as if it means something to the definition of natural born citizens. Then make some comments about the 14th Amendment because few will read it. That, along with the true, but irrelevant comment that “Because it was not defined in the Constitution,” simply confuses people, as it is designed to do. Virtually no words are defined in the Constitution, which was by design, so that interpretations depended only upon the words understood by the Framers at the time the Constitution was written.
The only constitutionally defined citizen before the 14th Amendment was a natural born citizen. Minor v. Happersett, questioning whether the 14th Amendment changed the privileges of citizens given women the right to vote. The 14th Amendment, it turns out, never mention sufferage, but to make the point, Chief Justice Waite needed an undoubted citizen. The only citizen for which there was a definition that was undoubted was the class to which Elizabeth Minor belonged, by far the majority of citizens, natural born citizens. Wong Kim Ark didn’t change that definition. No constitutional amendment can change an earlier definition by inference. Every word must be assumed to have meaning. Justice Gray never claimed to change that definition, and sited Minor v. Happersett as the authority, which it is.
If anyone cares whether the Constitution has relevanve, Barack Obama is in violation of the precedence established by Minor v. Happersett. Obama’s legal staff were always aware of this, and the evidence is in over 25 edited supreme court case records published by Obama’s Harvard schoolmate at his legal reference site justia.com. This must have legal ramifications, but to protect Obama’s ineligibility by providing counterfit supreme court cases will have to be addressed if and when we have a less corrupt justice department. (See Leo Donofrio’s evidence at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com)
It was Mr. Rodgers who said the things in support of WKA what you replied to, not me! I pinged you because I respect your articulation of the NBC issue, while I, unlike you, also value investigation of the birth location and BC authentication issue.
Well said sir!
Did you get my FRMail?
:)