Posted on 11/02/2011 7:19:44 AM PDT by LesDowrey
The face of the Occupy Dallas movement we've come to know over the past few weeks shows protesters angry over wealth and upset with big banks.
Now a convicted sex offender has overshadowed those demonstrators.
Richard Wayne Armstrong, 24, is charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old runaway from Garland at the protest group's downtown campsite. Police said Armstrong had been part of the group living in the tent city near City Hall, but he failed to register as a sex offender in Dallas County.
(Excerpt) Read more at wfaa.com ...
At first we thought it was funny to make the OWS Protestors Zombies in the latest episode of the Les Dowrey Show...Now we kinda think a Zombie Outbreak would be better than these animals!
If you haven't seen the latest episode then you should definitely Watch it Here!
It’s that DAMNED middle name again!!!!
The question is, did he register with the organizers of “occupy Dallas”?
After all, they HAVE rejected our society and all it’s trappings, so it is CLEARLY their responsibility to protect those attending the “occupation”.
Obama has been using these to drum up sympathy for his cause, and it's time to make him own them.
Start calling them what they really are:
Spread the meme....
"Police said Armstrong had been part of the group living in the tent city near City Hall, but he failed to register as a sex offender in Dallas County."
Just another scumbag associated with the OccuCreeps...nothing to see here.
I like it...”Obamaville - full of ObamaVillians”.
Actually, it's just resurrection of an old meme from the 1930's:
If we could get conservative media to take up the meme, it will be linked with Obama.
A bit late, if I do say so myself.
Since when has it been a surprise to law enforcement that when you assemble a large number of liberls you’re going to have a dramatic increase in per capita violent crime?
Question: What major demographic associated with violent crime in the US isn’t a major demographic component of the Democrat voter base...?
Answer: NONE!
What right do women (or girls in this case) have to withhold what others need?
If you can forcibly reallocate labor and wealth, why not bodies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.