Posted on 11/30/2011 6:28:08 AM PST by bray
Welcome to the United Soviet States of America..where the Pravda State Media “vet” the candidates to the pleasure and needs of the RinoCrat UniParty.
This “election” will be a non-election...featuring the state approved “candidates”-whose only distinction is whether they are black or white.
enough braying
If Herman Cain does not win the nomination, does he not have legal recourse against his accusers and the media institutions that continuously reported these allegations without evidence???
The very fact that they are trying to eliminate Cain says that he is the enemy of state-controlled media.
State-controlled media is my enemy, too.
The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.
Only the gullible fans of Cain believe that he is guilty.
The non-gullible fans of Cain believe that he is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
Cain has experienced the hardships of poverty. He has shown he has a heart for the "down and outs" and has been blessed with the means to help others.
MSM does not understand Christian resoprocity. Christians do not give up on people. Some people are life-time projects.
I have to ask the question, "If you are at the computer or by your cell phone late at night and someone e-mails or texts you a message, do you check the time before you respond?" If I was awake I would answer a message ASAP.
There is the issue of an attempted high tech lynching ala Clarence Thomas. There is the issue of whether or not this claim of a 13 year affair is as baseless as all the other harrassment issues or perhaps more legit.
And then there is the issue of how his staff has handled it, which is almost a unanimous epic fail.
And I think item B is the one that’s really hurting him the most.
Might as well string him up without a trial or any evidence, or any cross examination of the witness(es) against him.
I'm sick and tired of the old adage, “where there's smoke there has to be fire.” Not so.
Not one of these skanks can supply any hard evidence of any affairs or wrong doing by Herman Cain, and their timing is nothing rank politics of the lowest schungiest level.
You don't have to be a Cain supporter to see what's going on here, but you do have to be fair minded.
Pray for this good man and his family.
I have the called the man on his cell at 6 am on a Saturday morning, and he answered...and I wasn’t calling because I needed help. I wasn’t calling to set up a meeting, or responding to a call or email.
I was calling just to chat....
And he has NEVER signed any of my books!
But he did give me a copy of his CD of him singing Gospel songs....Still have it...need to get him to sign it!!!!
“MSM does not understand Christian resoprocity....”
sure they do. They perceive it to be weakness. At the time, the MSM perceived Christ as weak and gullible.
Bless you, bray; you are a FR treasure.
I am praying for Cain. Any conservative that enjoys or joins in the lynching of Cain will regret it. You can’t join forces w the enemy when it suits you and then hope they won’t stab you in the back when your turn comes. What they are doing to Cain is a picnic at the beach compared to what they will do to the nominee, be it Cain or someone else. Fight them now or live to regret it.
That is incredibly well-said!
That is awesome! Can you blow it up so we can read the words better?
Pray for Cain
So you really don’t care about the substance of the charge only the style that it is handled. Kinda one of those symbolism over substance guys.
How exactly do you handle that situation when the entire world is watching? You are the perfect example of my post and the reason they use those tactics.
Pray for Cain
>> So you really don’t care about the substance of the charge only the style that it is handled. Kinda one of those symbolism over substance guys. >>
What a childish and unnecessary little pout that was. Wow.
I do care about the substance of the charges. That is a valid discussion. That is one that is on going. It is one I have entered and will continue to do so.
But you way missed the point. My problem with this article (and several others that have been run lately) is NOT STYLE. It is that they are based on faulty assumptions and therefore make an argument from a flawed template.
That is far more than style. That is also a valid argument. I know that you and a lot of folks look for every single article ever to be a jumping off point for a pure candidate debate per se.
But I am not obsessed with candidates at every second. I like to actually read the articles and then debate the article’s ideas, and the idea that Newt’s supporters are all ignorant of and dismissive of his flaws is simply a stupid idea. And that was the total intent of my point. Nothing more, nothing less.
Nobody’s pouting so take that childish argument back to whatever website you normally post on. I seriously doubt you are a Newt supporter, my guess would be far more liberal than that.
C-Right sounds more like a cliche than a name so go disrupt another thread where people believe who you are. Tell your handlers you really got us.
Pray for Cain
Well stated, Bray.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.