Meghan McCain: If We Nominate Gingrich It Is ‘The End Of The Republican Party’

Mediaite ^ | 12/19/11 | James Crugnale

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Well, if she wants me to consider voting for Newt this will do it!

[cotton1706]

And that...is exactly what worries them!

[Mouton]

She is going to follow in Romney’s shoes regarding the Olympics. two laps around her will qualify as an olympic event.

[Tallguy]

Meghan, dear. The GOP survived having nominated your father. I think that we can survive a Gingrich nomination.

Meghan has such a long-view of US presidential politics, dontcha know?

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

No one cares what this idiotic girl thinks.

[Vermont Lt]

In terms Meg can understand: Whaaaatt-evvah.

[USS Alaska]

She just seems like a gal trying to get the attention from whomever she can and always has some sort of chip on her shoulder about almost everything.

She's like the 16 year old pretty girl that is described as "plump" not a fat hog, but not the size she wants to be, and she is angry about it.

It's her fault because of what she puts in her mouth but she wants the rest of the world to take the blame.

[qman]

"Meg, shut your fat yap. Your reach-across-the-aisle lame-o of a husband father had your shot and failed. There are enough libturds gunning at all the Republicans. They don’t need your ‘help.’ If you want Zero to get another 4 more years and completely destroy this republic (perhaps that’s what you want?) then just keep running your fool mouth off."

There corrected, McCain sucks but I doubt his in to incest.

[apocalypto]

I agree this is good news for Newt Gingrich. It is ironi since of he candidates, Newt is the most smiliar (although much better) than old J. McCain. Both married the mistress, both promote amnesty, both have baggage.

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

That’s it.

I was on the fence, now I definitely support Gingrich.

[ScottinVA]

Meghan McCain, aka the annoying wart on the foot that won’t go away.

[asinclair]

The end of the Republican Party

And what would rise from the ashes, I wonder? Could it be that we could have a new party that is all about the Constitution, as written (not interpreted), with limits on the subject of statute to that which is explicitly permitted by that document? With a tradition of applying reasonable sunset provisions to laws about temporary or changing conditions? To proposing bills that cover only a single subject, and with amendments pertaining only to the subject matter of the bill, and not be a "holiday tree" for marginal legislation?

That would be a party worth joining. At least, as long as the members of the party resist gaming the whole thing to their personal benefit, unlike the members of the two (and probably more) existing parties...

[bigbob]

How fat is she now? I'm certain she is on track to take Sally Strothers place (and a big wide place it is!) in a few years in the chillrun beg-a-thons...

[Maverick68]

Shut your fat, sluntish mouth.
Hell, I’d rather hear Lieberman’s advice about the party.

[forgotten man]

“Whaddya mean ‘we’, little trollop?”

When she says “we” she is referring to herself and the Krispy Kreme donuts she is eating.

[McGruff]

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Now that certainly is an attention getter in favor of Newt!

Who ever Skankan, Fatty McNasty endorses, fails miserably and whoever she condemns, wins.

[Niteranger68]

I can see her mouth moving, but all I hear is “OINK...OINK...OINK”.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

The Barnyard demands an apology for being likened to Ms McCain. They state that they are useful and productive where as Ms McCain's value is dubious.

[Palladin]

Geez...I have to pinch myself...hard!

For the first time, I agree with Miss Piggy!!!