Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BACHMANN: Little time to save America
The Washington Times ^ | 12/29/2011 | Rep. Michele Bachmann

Posted on 12/30/2011 11:28:09 AM PST by PieterCasparzen

...

My first act as president will be to repeal Obamacare and Dodd-Frank.

...

In its place, I’ll reform the health care system by ending state monopolies on health insurance, introducing real tort reform and providing tax incentives for health care providers who give free health care to those who cannot afford it.

...

I also will get government spending, which has spiraled ever upward, leaving us with over $15 trillion in debt, under control and shut down departments in the federal government that have no constitutional authority and, worse, waste your money. In the first 100 days, I will submit legislation to repeal laws establishing the Departments of Education, Commerce and Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency and their related bureaucracies.

...

I will honor the Constitution and send Congress a balanced budget in my first 100 days. If Congress passes an unbalanced budget, I will veto it.

...

Reforming our tax code and ending crony capitalism will send a signal to small businesses, the true job-creation engine of our economy, that they’ll be treated the same as large corporations.

...

I’ll also begin the process of undoing the enormous government regulatory burden on America. I’ll start by legalizing American energy production, which will bring down the cost of gas, create millions of jobs and decrease our dependency on foreign sources of energy.

...

I’ll also secure our border and begin building the fence in the first 100 days. I’ll begin immediately enforcing our immigration laws, empower our border agents and help the states instead of suing them. And I’ll submit legislation to make English the official language of our federal government.

...

Finally, I’ll defend the family. I will ensure that Planned Parenthood no longer receives federal funding.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: conservatism; michelebachmann
An excerpt from Michele's Op/Ed.

True conservative policies except for one, which I understand is a necessary evil and all the sane Republican candidates are supporting it. To not advocate it would lose key support. Can you guess which policy I'm referring to ?

Can you find any other policy in this article that is not a good conservative policy ? I can't. IMHO, this op/ed outlines what a conservative voter would consider as their ideal nominee from a policy point of view.

1 posted on 12/30/2011 11:28:21 AM PST by PieterCasparzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

The “unconservative” policy that Repubs are supporting is in the article, not in my excerpt...


2 posted on 12/30/2011 11:30:38 AM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I think it’s already too late. With 50% of the country now official government freeloaders demanding handouts of every kind, there will be no going back. 50% of the population has become “garbage dump bears.”


3 posted on 12/30/2011 11:31:43 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Stop BIG Government Greed!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
I'll add this from her website.

REPATRIATION. More than 1.2 trillion United States dollars could be brought back to America in days as an immediate "stimulus" if the government would zero out the tax rate on that money until December 31, and then permanently keep it here in the U.S. if taxed at a rate of 5 percent. Foreign earnings totaling over $1.2 trillion is more than the President's failed stimulus and it won't come out of taxpayer wallets. It would increase the value of the dollar, provide valuable capital for the job creators in this country and pump tremendous amounts of money into our economy.

CUT SPENDING AND GOVERNMENT. I have already voted to cut federal spending in the years ahead, every single time I have had the opportunity. In addition, I would phase out quasi-governmental enterprises, such as Fannie and Freddie, and eliminate duplicative government programs and costs. We must decrease government salaries to bring them in line with their private sector counterparts, and we must decrease the number of government employees. Over-spending by the government hurts job creation by devaluing the dollar and stealing capital from the private sector.

REPEAL OBAMACARE. Healthcare is one-sixth of the U.S. economy and this unconstitutional takeover of healthcare by the federal government is creating crippling uncertainty for employers across this country. This legislation does nothing to address the true problem with our healthcare system – cost – and will cost states trillions. I believe it is an intentional backstop to imploding healthcare entitlement programs — Medicare and Medicaid — to transition toward a single payer-system. This is the number one hindrance to job creation in the United States (according to a recently released UBS study).

CUT TAXES. I've demonstrated a firm commitment to cutting spending and balancing the budget. We need to reduce the number of tax brackets, repeal taxes outlined in Obamacare, fix the Alternative Minimum Tax, and eliminate the Death Tax. In addition, we must make the corporate tax code simpler and fairer, and allow U.S. companies that generate earnings overseas to bring back those profits and invest them in American jobs and growth.

REPEAL THE JOBS AND HOUSING DESTRUCTION ACT, ALSO KNOWN AS DODD-FRANK. This law tightened regulations on banks, made it harder for Americans to obtain credit, and failed to address the systemic problem that caused the Wall Street collapse — leverage. This 849-page bill calls for 400 new sets of rules that will be written on 6000 Federal Register pages, all written by bureaucrats, many of whom have never worked in the financial services field. The law also creates a potentially intrusive Financial Services Consumer Protection Bureau that is not accountable to Congress and which has but a vague mandate to combat misconduct – so in the wrong hands, it could cause its own kind of misconduct.

LEGALIZE AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION AND AMERICA'S NATURAL RESOURCES. This could create 1.4 million jobs, bringing $800 billion of new revenue into the U.S. Treasury, and increasing domestic energy supplies by 50 percent. The price of energy has a direct impact on nearly ever facet of our lives. We have to abandon the parochial and political energy policies of the past and install a comprehensive energy plan that not only reduces our reliance on unfriendly foreign regimes, but also creates millions of American jobs and generates increased tax revenues. According to the Congressional Research Service, the U.S. has more energy potential than any other country in the world. We should use that potential. It is a better policy to create American jobs and explore in an environmentally-sound way, than to rely on foreign dictators who give little regard to the environment. This includes specific strategies like reviving the logging, timber, mining and metals industries, and bringing federal lands back into productive activity by repealing radical environmental laws that kill access to natural resources.

REPEAL JOB KILLING REGULATIONS. America's job creators and small business owners have lost economic liberty under the weight of $1.8 billion annually in compliance costs with government regulations. Together we sent $2.2 trillion in taxes to the federal government this year. By comparison, job creators spend nearly as much annually to comply with bureaucratic mandates. Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, and the string of mandates and rules from the Environmental Protection Agency — as well as other agencies — are creating such incredible uncertainty in the market. The House Republican leadership has identified 219 planned Obama administration regulations, each of which will cost the economy more than $100 million. This red tape rampage must stop.

INCREASE EXPORTS. This President has been holding hostage trade deals with Colombia, Panama and South Korea as he tries to negotiate favor for Big Labor. The world needs to know that we are open for business and U.S. Companies need to expand beyond our borders to the 95 percent of people who do not live here.

UNLEASH AMERICAN INVESTMENT. By eliminating unnecessary taxes and regulation, and expanding trade, we will create an incentive for investment in America again. We must do whatever it takes to restore our ability to manufacture here in the U.S. We can do this by reforming the tax code, providing incentive for growth, and allowing the private sector to control the market with little government involvement.

PAVE A PATHWAY FOR INNOVATION. Recent reports indicated that the United States has now slipped to 5th in the competitiveness rankings, and 47th in education. How do we expect to lead the world economically when we are not doing what is needed to inspire and foster innovation here at home? The future of the American economy lies with the innovation of this and future generations.

ENFORCE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWS. The failure of the federal government to enforce its immigration laws costs federal, state and local governments billions of dollars annually. Our nation was founded on the rule of law, and we must ensure U.S. immigration laws are respected and enforced not only to preserve our national security, but to protect federal, state, and local budgets, and to curb the unfair strain on our country's job markets.

4 posted on 12/30/2011 11:33:53 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

So how do we get the US electorate to agree with these positions?


5 posted on 12/30/2011 11:47:36 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (No good deed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

This sense of urgency is missing among the front runners.


6 posted on 12/30/2011 11:48:44 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

“So how do we get the US electorate to agree with these positions?”

I believe they do, but the MSM continues to shove big government progressives down our throat. It wouldn’t matter if everyone wanted Bachmann, the ‘polls’ would still say Romney was the frontrunner and the only one who could ‘beat’ Obama.


7 posted on 12/30/2011 11:59:58 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Internet content like this helps. America needs a shot-in-the-arm of morality, a revival that spans decades.

It’s a lot of work to change hearts and minds at the grassroots level. A massive effort is needed. And there are many ways to influence. Instead of running away from the front lines conservatives need to run towards the front lines.

If the work is never started, it will never be accomplished.


8 posted on 12/30/2011 12:00:31 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I really wish Michelle was electable and didn’t make so many minor mistakes.


9 posted on 12/30/2011 3:05:00 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Repealing Obamacare is the ONLY GOAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Michele and Santorum are the only two who actually would give Obama a tough time.

Here’s the Democrat game plan for all the others:

(mind you, NOTHING has to be true for the media to push it 24x7)

Newt:
paint him as devisive (aimed at dopey centrist voters)
say he has “crazy” big plans to privatize and deregulate (aimed at the poor and unions)
he’s an old-school wacky conservative from yesteryear (trot out clinton-era Dems to hammer away at his past)
say he cheated on his multiple wives (aimed at mild-mannered Christians who are undecided)
harp on his changing his positions
brand him as a lobbyist
hammer away that he will end a “woman’s right to choose”
Perry:
tied to the evil oil industry
tie him to Bush
say he’s dopey
hammer away that he will end a “woman’s right to choose”
Paul:
say he’s nuts (almost zero chance of him beating Obama)
Romney:
tie him to the evil wall street industry
remind that he’s mormon/brand him as weird for that
keep saying he’s rich
harp on his changing his positions
hammer away that he will end a “woman’s right to choose”

You can see how these guys are in very weak positions in the general election.

Their temptation will be to go towards the left, to abandon conservative positions or soften them (speak out of both sides of their mouth) in order to court undecided and independent voters.

The moment they do this they will start losing the right-wing base, making them not so excited about coming out to the polls.

If the candidate, on the other hand, is a hard-core conservative like Bachmann or Santorum on the social conservative issues - they simply put out of their mind bending on those positions. Instead, they simply say those are their personal principles, and seek to try to change people’s thinking by convincing them of the rightness of their principles. And then simply remind the voter that there are 3 branches of government and they are not a dictator.

Those super conservatives then... to undecided and independent voters, appear completely different than Obama. It’s like trying a different direction. The Republican starts running to the right - and Obama has to try to follow. If he does not, he is then relying solely on his hard-left base and crooked election tactics.

IMHO...


10 posted on 12/30/2011 3:27:59 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

I’m not worried about Obama, all though you may be right that the left is trying to fix who Obama runs against.

But I’m not worried. I’m convinced Obama is done and can’t survive the effects of the economic depression. When they hit the booths, the voters are going to want “change” from the incumbents and that means Obama and his party are going to be smacked for the current economic conditions. That is my opinion.

But I am sure you are right that Obama and the MSM/DNC are doing what they can to run against whoever is weakest. I still think Obama would have loved Cain to be the GOP nominee so he could have smashed him with all the infidelity gossip. Obama must be furious at rove for killing his chance to run against Cain.


11 posted on 12/30/2011 4:21:24 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Repealing Obamacare is the ONLY GOAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson