Skip to comments.16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be A Really, Really Bad President
Posted on 01/08/2012 8:19:39 PM PST by STARWISE
The fact that Barack Obama looked sharp and could give inspiring speeches helped him go a long way back in 2008. Well, it is the same thing with Romney. The guy looks very presidential and he sounds very presidential. When backed into a corner, he is extremely slick. He rarely makes mistakes and he is very polished.
Mitt Romney is a "politician" in the worst sense of the word. As his past has demonstrated, he will do and say just about anything in order to get elected. The positions he has taken during this campaign season have been carefully calculated to help him win both the Republican nomination and the general election.
That is why so many call Mitt Romney a "flip-flopper". Romney will take just about any political position if he thinks that it will help him. Mitt Romney's wife, Ann Romney, once made the following statement about her husband....
He can argue any side of a question. And sometimes you think hes really believing his argument, but hes not.
So keep that in mind while reading the following information. Mitt Romney is trying to claim that he is a "conservative" and that he is looking out for the American people, but those claims simply are not true.
The following are 16 reasons why Mitt Romney would be a really, really bad president....
#1 Obamacare was one of the worst pieces of legislation ever passed by the U.S. Congress. Mitt Romney says that he would repeal Obamacare, but the reality is that Romneycare was what Obamacare was based on. In fact, a recent MSNBC article brought to light some new information about the relationship between Romneycare and Obamacare....
Newly obtained White House records provide fresh details on how senior Obama administration officials used Mitt Romneys landmark health-care law in Massachusetts as a model for the new federal law, including recruiting some of Romneys own health care advisers and experts to help craft the act now derided by Republicans as Obamacare.
The records, gleaned from White House visitor logs reviewed by NBC News, show that senior White House officials had a dozen meetings in 2009 with three health-care advisers and experts who helped shape the health care reform law signed by Romney in 2006, when the Republican presidential candidate was governor of Massachusetts.
Mitt Romney continues to defend Romneycare, but the reality is that it really is a total nightmare for Massachusetts. The following is how one blogger summarized some of the key points of Romneycare....
Punitive To Individuals. Everyone must buy health insurance or face tax penalties equal to 50% of cost of standard policy.
Hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on free hospital care were converted into subsidies to help the needy buy insurance.
A health insurance exchange was established to help connect the uninsured with private health plans at more affordable rates.
Health plans can offer consumers higher deductibles and more restrictive physician and hospital networks in order to lower costs.
Punitive to Businesses with 11 or more workers that do not offer insurance must pay a $295 per employee fee.
Established payment policy advisory board; one Board member must be from Planned Parenthood. No pro-life organization represented.
Provides Taxpayer-Funded Abortions for copay of $50.
So what have been the results of Romneycare in Massachusetts? According to the Daily Caller, health care costs and health insurance premiums have gone up dramatically in Massachusetts....
Since the bill became law, the states total direct health-care spending has increased by a remarkable 52 percent. Medicaid spending has gone from less than $6 billion a year to more the $9 billion. Many consumers have seen double-digit percentage increases in their premiums.
All of that certainly sounds a whole lot like Obamacare.
Unfortunately, the other Republican candidates have not taken advantage of this weakness. According to one brand new poll, 6 times as many Republicans view Romneycare unfavorably as view it favorably. This is something that the other candidates should be jumping on big time.
#2 During his time as governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney significantly raised taxes. The following is an excerpt from a CBS News article....
Mitt Romney's Harvard MBA and gold-plated resume convinced many business leaders he would follow in the tradition of corporate-friendly Republicans when he was elected governor of Massachusetts in 2002.
Within three years, some had a vastly different opinion, after Romney's efforts raised the tax bill on businesses by $300 million
The same article also notes that Romney jacked up "fees and fines" on Massachusetts taxpayers substantially....
Romney and lawmakers also approved hundreds of millions in higher fees and fines during his four years in office.
Many in the Massachusetts business community were quite disgusted with Romney by the end of his tenure. Peter Nicholas, the chairman of Boston Science Corporation, says that "tax rates on many corporations almost doubled because of legislation supported by Romney."
#3 Government spending in Massachusetts increased significantly under Mitt Romney. An advocate of smaller government he most definitely is not.
#16 Mitt Romney is a big time Wall Street insider. It is estimated that Romney has a personal fortune of approximately a quarter of a billion dollars, and Wall Street money is being absolutely showered on his campaign.
In a recent article entitled "The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election", I detailed how numbers compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show that Mitt Romney is getting far more money from the "too big to fail" Wall Street banks than all of the other Republican candidates combined.
The following is an excerpt from that article that shows how much money employees of those banks (and their wives) have been giving to Romney so far this year....
Mitt Romney: $352,200 Barack Obama: $49,124 Tim Pawlenty: $25,000 Jon Huntsman: $6,750 Rick Perry: $5,500 Ron Paul: $2,500
Mitt Romney: $184,800 Tim Pawlenty: $41,715 Barack Obama: $28,225 Rick Perry: $20,750 Jon Huntsman: $9,750 Newt Gingrich: $1,000 Ron Paul: $1,000 Herman Cain: $500
Bank of America
Mitt Romney: $112,500 Barack Obama: $46,699 Tim Pawlenty: $12,750 Jon Huntsman: $4,250 Ron Paul: $3,451 Rick Perry: $2,600 Thad McCotter: $2,000 Herman Cain: $750 Michele Bachmann: $500 Newt Gingrich: $250
Mitt Romney: $107,250 Barack Obama: $38,039 Rick Perry: $27,050 Tim Pawlenty: $16,750 Jon Huntsman: $7,500 Ron Paul: $5,451
Mitt Romney: $56,550 Barack Obama: $36,887 Tim Pawlenty: $5,300 Rick Perry: $3,000 Herman Cain: $1,465 Michele Bachmann: $1,000 Ron Paul: $702
As you can see, no other Republican candidate even comes close to Romney at any of these big Wall Street banks.
In fact, of the candidates that are left in the Republican race, Mitt Romney has raised 13 times as much Wall Street money as anyone else has.
The following are the overall donation numbers from employees of the big Wall Street banks and their wives....
Mitt Romney: $813,300 Barack Obama: $198,874 Tim Pawlenty: $101,515 Rick Perry: $58,900 Jon Huntsman: $28,250 Ron Paul: $13,104 Herman Cain: $2,715 Michelle Bachmann: $1,500 Newt Gingrich: $1,250
These numbers paint a very disturbing picture. Even though Romney's poll numbers are in the mid to low 20s most of the time, employees of the big Wall Street banks gave him $813,300 during the first 9 months of this year and they only gave $105,719 to the rest of the Republican candidates combined.
It is quite obvious that the "establishment" is in love with Mitt Romney.
But if the American people elect Mitt Romney, they will get someone who believes in big spending, big government, bank bailouts, health care mandates, climate change legislation, liberal judges, gun control laws, amnesty for illegal aliens and making things as comfortable for the fatcats on Wall Street as possible.
Rest @ link
He’s boring. Is that on the list?
We know he would be a lousy President but what kind of Republican voters do we have that are too blind to see it?
Mitt Romney will never be President.
But his attempt to be elected may divide the Citizens enough to re-elect Obozo and destroy the nation.
The reason why he’ll be an improvement: He’s not Obama.
Pretty sure that point alone trumps all 16 attacks against him. A weak republican is better for this country than the most devout democrat.
He'll be the Republican candidate. If there is someone better why aren't the people electing him?? The person with the most votes wins. If Romney wins and he isn't your guy, then it must be your fault.
Bad Gov. Romney, in another of his hit and runs
managed to even raise taxes on New Hampshire residents
while Gov. of Massachusetts.
Believe it or not.
Support the Republican nominee whoever he may be.
It will not be my fault, because I will not vote for Romney.
But, I do not see how Romney can win the primary. He will not carry the South. Will not happen.
If he does win the nomination. There will be a total revolt. Very Very bad outcome.
Not anymore, after the turd sandwich we got in 2008, that was the last straw.
From your profile:
... A mix of libertarian and conservative views form a mess of political views ..
FYI: this IS a conservative site .. staunchly, ardently conservative.
I agree. Support the republican or go down with the scorched ashes that will be left of America.
I was on FR all through the Bush years with a different name. I was always so proud of the posters for being polite and not calling names.
Now, I am sorry to say that some FR Romney bashers sound just like the rude crude DU posters.
I beg to differ - when backed into a corner he ISN’T slick. He wasn’t in ‘08 and he isn’t now. He’s been given a pass so far by media and in debates but such won’t be the case against BHO. He’ll get that deer in the headlights look in his eyes and get rattled or he’ll get petulant, both of which we’ve seem before. Either way, he’ll puss out and it would be disastrous. No, “slick” I could respect and support against The Wan. Our guy has to have the killer instinct, the verbal skill to deliver blows and the cool steel to take everything BHO throws and sling it right back at him.
It ain’t Mittens!
I would think that the 75% voting against him would be a sort of clue for you, and that is with the full support of the Rockefeller wing of the GOP, the media, his huge, vast organization, his vast sums of money, and his non stop running since 2006.
If he wins, it will be your fault, and the people who share your views.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.