He will present a forged BC legally certified by the HDOH if he provides anything at all.
And if that’s good enough for the judge we’re in trouble.
They’re going to have to work fast to do that ... and a new forgery better be bullet-proof. Any discrepancy between a new one and what he already released is going to sink his ship faster than the Costa Concordia.
Agree on both counts.
I think you have pointed out elsewhere that there is a genuine "chain of custody" issue unless the judge receives the BC directly from HI. It is inconceivable that opposing counsel would not have access to the exhibit for nondestructive examination (particularly since damages from an inadvertent loss is limited to <$50), but I am not familiar with GA's procedure codes applicable at the administrative level.
If they are not given access, they may plan to immediately go to state court. Their argument includes the fact he has spent enormous sums to avoid production, there is no record of birth in a HI hospital, he has never produced to any state for the purpose of establishing eligibility, and everything he has voluntarily produced to date has been patently defective; that this production not coming from the issuer, is simply a continuation of that agenda.