Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And Then There Were Four
Noman Says ^ | 1/19/12 | Noman

Posted on 01/20/2012 12:02:02 PM PST by Sick of Lefties

The second South Carolina Republican presidential debate started off with a bang, or was it a thump? Newt Gingrich demonstrated why he is dangerous enough to the media's agenda setters for ABC and the rest of the establishment to take him out by flattening--and Noman means crepe thin--their mouthpiece, CNN moderator John King, over his opening question about Marianne Gingrich.

Both Gingrich and King handled it well--especially King, who had just had his posterior kicked up to his anterior--as did the other candidates, who were invited to opine. They more-or-less rallied around Gingrich, and agreed to talk about issues that affect the country, and not just the candidates.

CNN after the debate featured the usual suspects, i.e., David Gergen, Donna Brazile, discussing the smack down. Two points seem worth addressing.

The first is that the Marianne Gingrich story had gone viral, which supposedly justified, indeed obliged, King's opening question. Everybody was talking about it, and wanted to know, so he needed to ask.

True as that might be, it had only gone viral due to the ministrations of the very media that then justified the questioning on the basis of its having gone viral. Its own agency had created the necessity, not an external agency's as would be the case with an earthquake or a credit downgrade by S&P.

The story, and the question, are self serving. They are the kinds of thing that media always does to Republicans--who they oppose--but never to Democrats--who they are.

The second was a point about Newt's woman problem: Gingrich has far higher support among men than he does among women. Whether Marianne's story is true or not, women voters are likely to sympathize with the story of a rejected woman, and to reject the man that is alleged to have caused her pain.

Women's feeling are too predictably unpredictable, and far beyond Noman's competence to understand, for him to predict. But, he recalls that President Clinton didn't have the type of woman problem alluded to, though he had that other, more predatory type in his soul.

His de facto open marriage didn't seem to bother women, and still doesn't. Perhaps Newt's alleged overtures towards such an arrangement with Marianne won't bother them either.

Moreover, women may be mollified by the knowledge that Marianne herself was the beneficiary of one of Newt's earlier rejections, that of his first wife Jackie who was suffering from cancer. They might have read and taken to heart the biblical passage about reaping what one sows, or heard the saying that whatever goes around comes around.

That hardly exonerates Newt: pre-conversion, libidinous, queasy-about-illness, young and full of himself Newt. It is to suggest that maybe women will forgive, without forgetting about, Newt's alleged transgressions and focus on themes that affect their own faithful husbands and dependent children, who are suffocating in President Obama's spread-the-wealth, who-you-know economy.

Make no mistake about it, if the full reality is as Newt's vengeful ex-wife depicts, then he was a cad. And, if he was, he still might be.

Were he to be elected President despite possessing an actually deficient moral character, the electorate can take solace in knowing that he is neither the first such person to occupy the Oval Office, nor likely to be the last, of either sex. Democrats can take comfort in knowing that the standards of rectitude were debased at their behest, and in order to accommodate their candidates.

But, enough of this tawdry seriousness. In the spirit of frivolous media coverage, can you identify these four remaining candidates?

[four pictures]

Noman thought so.

TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: johnking; newtgingrich
The John King smack down.
1 posted on 01/20/2012 12:02:03 PM PST by Sick of Lefties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sick of Lefties

Newt is far from perfect...but this is the side of him I like. He is not afraid to say what he is thinking....and would destroy Barky in a debate setting.

2 posted on 01/20/2012 12:09:37 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Maybe we need a rascal in the White House-—Look at Bill Clinton—he was a better leader than Obama. I think the old bitter divorce thing shouldn’t be a game changer. I think Newt might be a great—maybe really great—leader. He will take Obama to the bank and cash him in once they meet in a debate. Remember people thought Reagan was a crazy cowboy—nations feared us and refused to challenge us. Newt will not give away the store to China or Saudi Arabia. lets see how things turn out in the next few weeks.

3 posted on 01/20/2012 12:18:18 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

His problem is there’s a Good Newt and a Bad Newt and nobody can be sure which one will come out on any given day.

4 posted on 01/20/2012 2:30:26 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson