Posted on 01/27/2012 3:35:42 PM PST by Lazlo in PA
As the race for the Republican presidential nomination has reached a point where opposition research has hit a fever pitch, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum is discovering that even he isnt immune from vicious political attacks.
A Washington Examiner piece by Joel Gehrke reported Friday that Santorum supported individual health mandates, citing a 1994 The Morning Call (Pa.) story. But as The Right Scoop blog pointed out on Friday, the article doesnt even quote Santorum as supporting the individual mandate.
Running for the U.S. Senate in 1994, however, Santorum actually said just the opposite of that, as a video from CSPAN shows. The Oct. 31, 1994 video has Santorum saying government shouldnt dictate anything on health care.
I think what the role of the federal government is to provide opportunity for everyone to get what they want, to live their dreams and not to dictate what everybody should have, he said.
And he explained why, which is even when certain things are mandated by the federal government, they often dont work and added it simply is not the American way of doing things.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Are you a Paul supporter? In my view we have a the choice now between 3 big government republicans and Ron Paul. Because I believe that we cannot abandon Israel I can not support Ron Paul. But of the three remaining, Santorum is the least “Big Government”.
Newt
Mark Levin, a conservative’s conservative supports Rick Santorum. Levin also knows Santorum isn’t perfect - no one is - but I doubt if your post shows his imperfections, because you don’t give the reasons for his vote, and it is an obvious hit piece.
You don’t help your credibility when you show such strong bias.
NOW it’s the end of the discussion.
Good evening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.