Canada Free Press:
(snip)
Who will save Freedom?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
“...Orly Taitz, who has made defending the Constitution and the American way of life a personal ambition, in the absence of any constitutional leadership.”
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
_________________________
God bless Dr. Taitz.
She has done more than anyone in the U.S to try to bring the Marxist/Muslim down.
She may not succeed this time, but eventually she will- and she’ll go down in American history as one of the great patriots.
There is a lot that I like about Orly and she deserves a tremendous amount of credit for everything she has done. Her efforts are almost inhuman. That being said, I didn’t like what she said about Sheriff Joe, that was beneath her. Joe is fighting his own battles and Orly should not be a putdown artist so quick toward others who are in the fight.
Thank you for sharing. I watched the show Orly put on and was disturbed on many levels, not the least of which, was no apparent planning that went into what she did that day...very haphazard and hard to follow how it applied to the case at hand. Then when she jumped into the stand to testify I was incredulous.
This article and other research has gone a long way towards informing me of what is the good, bad and the ugly in this whole mess.
I am baffled as to how people continue to support Obama and even more puzzled by why the broke faith with America and put him on the ballot in the first place. It wasn’t like they didn’t have a great candidate...they had Hillary who came within a whisker of preventing this whole mess.
The truth is that America’s enemies (both here and abroad) are numerous, very powerful and influential!
Welcome to the party.
What was behind the animosity at this meeting between the two of you? Had you previously denounced her work? Just trying to to understand where you are coming from. Are you saying that her claims that the BC is forged is bogus? I agree that the (lack of) NBC status for zero needs to to be addressed in court, but why not also the shenanigans behind the BC and SSN?
I really don’t care about Orly Taitz, Sheriff Joe, or anybody else. The fact remains that Obama’s father was Barack Obama Sr, a Kenyan and British national. It is up to the courts to determine whether Obama lineage meets the Constitutional requirement of a natural born citizen. This piece smells like an attempt to shift the focus to Orly Taitz and her thrist for fame, and none of it seems germain to the issue. As such I would label it diversionary.
Why is anyone trying to gather ANY evidence when Obama freely admits that his father was not a citizen?
And, to what did she “testify”? While “testifying” about Barack Obama's Illinois Bar Application, Judge Malihi asked Orly what “personal knowledge” she had about the document (this is a common “legal” question), and Orly's response was that she had downloaded the image from the internet herself. Really? Did an attorney actually say that to a judge? I don't know if I could have been more embarrassed.
LOL!
No wonder Jablonski didn't show up. Why bother? He had Orly there to effectively torpedo the case.
Thanks for the Vattelevision stream. I was bored, and that was more entertaining than anything on TV (could the wait for Game of Thrones be any longer? Ugh.)
I’ve said some pretty mean things about Orly Taitz in the past, but I couldn’t help but feel some empathetic embarrassment for her as the hearing dragged on. Her appearance helped Obama more than any attorney he could have sent. And birthers are giving her money!
ORLY IS A BIGGER PAIN IN THE ASS TO OBAMA THAN MOST SO I APPLAUD HER EFFORTS
“Their having chosen to present evidence, therefore, precluded a default order, as such an order is awarded in the absence of any evidence being presented.”
Not true!
A Default Order should be issued because of the actions of the Defendant and have nothing to do with the actions of the Plaintiffs.
How utterly ... childish, to make lots of noise about ‘the conclusion’, as if it will be a cut and dried statment of the truth, then the ‘child’s tantrum on the floor’ routine is all the conclusion amounts to. Really and who is the diversion? Sheesh
In 2009 I spent some time working with and supporting Dr. Taitz’s efforts. Her passion is commendable.
In her presentations she is like a fire hose and could improve her effectivness substantially by becoming more like a drinking fountain. But I doubt she ever will.
I thought it was customary at FR to label these sorts of topics (articles by/for the poster) with VANITY in the heading....
“It is the understanding of the first two attorneys to present their cases that, whichever way the judge decides will ultimately result in an appeal, and with their evidence being presented, they have prepared their cases to proceed to the highest court in the land, if necessary.”
No!
An appeal will be to Georgia Superior Court and it will be de novo (fresh start, new case). Evidence and testimony will have to be introduced, again.
The Administrative Hearing is a function of the Georgia legislative branch. Georgia Superior Court is a function of the Georgia Judicial branch. Obama and his attorney know this and are not worried about a default judgement which will result in the GA SoS taking Obama off the Georgia Preferential Ballot. They’ll appeal the GA SoS’s action and new trial will be held in Georgia Superior Court, de novo.
Exactly.
The problem with that theory is that one can argue the absolutely undeniable fact that a subpoena downloaded from the website of an ALJ in GA carries no force and has no effect upon the Hawaii DoH and still end up saying "we agree to disagree" about what is a fact. Sad, but true.
Two professional and credible witnesses have testified under oath in an administrative court during an administrative hearing in Georgia that Obama’s SSN# appears to be fraudulent.
Does Obama have a tax attorney? Does this tax attorney know about these claims of fraud? Does this tax attorney have an obligation to ask Obama if he is using a stolen SSN#?
Does this attorney have any liability if he has been informed of possible fraud? Is this attorney willing to submit Obama’s tax forms this year?
Tides turn, public mood shifts, power changes hands, information previously unavailable suddenly becomes available. Those who think they are protected will find themselves without protection.
Who else wants to go down on the S.S. Obama?