Actually, it is the conservative resistance to Mitt that will give more states (Americans) the opportunity to voice their opinion on who the GOP nominee will be -- that and allocated delegates.
That may actually be a good thing - delaying the time when the Democrats and MSM (but I repeat myself) can focus their hit pieces and advertisements on just one person.
That may actually be a good thing - delaying the time when the Democrats and MSM (but I repeat myself) can focus their hit pieces and advertisements on just one person.
This is good for a variety of reasons but importantly it gives us an opportunity to expose Mitt for the Midway Carny he really is.
Same Shiite just cheaper.... or more expensive.
Meanwhile, California moved it’s primary back to where it was years ago.....the first week of June.
This clearly helps Romney a ton; actually; unlikely to do really well in either state, he’d rather have these later rather than sooner, and he can counteract them with strong performances in New York and California.
Also the longer the race lasts the more money is important, which helps Romney.
Failed argument. Since when did TX, PA and other now holding so called “late” primaries rush to move up their primary dates? It was all the others holding earlier and earlier dates that now cause this frustration of the MS Media and Romney. The MSM wanted it stretched out, now they can’t stand it with no clear winner to focus on. The alternative is a “National Primary Day” which no one will ever agree to.
Proportional allocation of delegates will take this fight to the convention floor if all 4 are able to stay in the race.