To: edge919
I think if you check the judge’s ruling you will see he was just talking about Orly’s evidence and witnesses.
To: Harlan1196; edge919; All
I think if you check the judges ruling you will see he was just talking about Orlys evidence and witnesses.Why "think" when you can
KNOW!
@Farrar/Welden/Swensson/Powell v Obama - Judge Malihi Final Decision - Georgia Ballot Challenge - 2/3/2012
This Decision has been consolidated to include the four challenges to President Obama's candidacy filed by Plaintiffs David Farrar, et al., David P. Welden, Carl Swensson, and Kevin Richard Powell. Section I of this Decision applies only to the case presented by Ms. Taitz on behalf of Mr. Farrar and his co-plaintiffs,Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren, and Laurie Roth, and does not pertain, in any way, to the cases of Mr. Welden, Mr. Swensson, and Mr. Powell. Section II applies to all Plaintiffs.
And as far as Section II is concerned...what does "considered" mean?
118 posted on
02/18/2012 12:14:49 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Harlan1196
You do understand he never said anything about ANY probative evidence being entered by ANY of the parties?? If you believe otherwise, let’s see the quote.
153 posted on
02/18/2012 1:34:08 PM PST by
edge919
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson