Posted on 03/01/2012 10:58:04 PM PST by Windflier
"Most certainly, vital records and statistics were never intended to be used as evidence for determining the eligibility of individuals to hold public office. The information contained in them does not provide an accurate portrayal of the specific natal circumstances, biographical events and geographic indicators required for determining Natural-born citizenry. Vital records simply are not qualified for making such determinations, but in the absence of other vetting resources and effort by authorities, they serve as a starting point for investigation.
Since some have chosen to elicit validation from the absurdity of internet images of alleged 50-year-old birth records, without so much as questioning their authenticity or origins, to determine a previously obscure politicians eligibility to hold the most powerful and dangerous position in the world, they get what they deserve in their failure to demand a higher vetting standard.
Not only has the American public descended to new depths of endemic irrationality over Obamas alleged birth records, the complex world of vital records and statistics has been breached to reveal some of the most bizarre protocols and complex logistics of any municipal service.
Tragically, so many remain willing to accept an ambiguous, uncorroborated image of an alleged document posted to the most corruptible and unreliable source of mythology in history, the internet, as the holy grail of some politicians legitimacy to hold the greatest executive and military power on earth."
The above is just a small excerpt from the much larger article, which goes into great detail about the evidence for fraud with Obama’s LFBC.
I haven’t even fully digested it all yet, but the author’s opening statements are some of the most cogent, and eloquent that I’ve yet read on this subject.
Yeah.... What you said.
Go to the original article....ping
Wow! This is an impressive read! I always wondered what those penciled codes meant...This definitely has new info. that should be considered. Thanks for posting!
Pinging to Nachum
bc bookmark
Good article made difficult by the authors constant injection of opinion and hyperbole. It could have been a good 25% or more shorter and easier to get through.
ping for later
read it once, will read it a second time...finally someone has it all on one page, thanks for the ping!
BTW,
Thanks to you, I posted the article on ATS here:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread815102/pg1
Given the liberal bent of most posters and mods there . . . if anyone wants to increase the likelihood that some of the more fair-minded folks there would see the truth—they are welcome to post on the thread.
AT this late hour in the disintegration of our Republic . . . I figure we need all the publicity of the truth . . . that we can spread far and wide.
Great find.
“The third requirement of natural-born citizenship is continuity of that status without renouncement, voluntary or not, by expatriation, extradition or adoption to foreign parents.”
A nice thought, but is there a shred of Constitutional corroboration of this claim?
great stuff! :-)
BTTT
It's right there in Article II, Section One:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President".
This includes present status, thus if born a natural born citizen but changed status before running for President, one is not eligible to serve.
The conclusion by former Social Security Administration record investigators is very damning.
"...Obamas certificate number is either fraudulently assigned by forgers, or it was changed to an odd number after the original contents of the document were entered in order to prevent inquiries into Obamas record file tape. Under either circumstance, information about Obamas birth is being intentionally obscured in order to hide his actual natal history and the negative impact it would have on his eligibility to be president."
There are various definitions of the term “natural-born citizen.” It’s not defined in the Constitution. Supposedly, even if you were born in the US to parents who were both aliens, you would still be “natural born.”
This is the best analysis of O’s birth certificate that I’ve ever seen. This and Sheriff Arpaio’s bombshell yesterday should trigger a Congressional investigation into possible forged identity documents.
Thanks for posting.
If that’s all you’re getting it from, then you’re in trouble. We don’t allow parental moves such as adoption to negate regular citizenship status, and I certainly don’t see the precedent that has been established on that re NBC status.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.