Skip to comments.
Santorum Called for Federal Ethanol Mandate
Conservatives4Palin ^
| 3/11/201
| Mary Beth House
Posted on 03/11/2012 5:56:18 PM PDT by katiedidit1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
To: katiedidit1
Thanks, katie!
I’ve never cared for Rick S., and have despised him even more during the Primaries as he has tried to portray himself as Conservative (like Romney does). ....Rick apparently forgets that his past is available to the public.
Ethanol mandates and subsidies must be canceled!
81
posted on
03/11/2012 10:00:55 PM PDT
by
octex
To: CynicalBear
Whether they use health care or not, Newt wants the GOVERNMENT to FORCE them to buy insurance or be “HELD ACCOUNTABLE” that includes people who DON”T DEPEND on the GOVERNMENT---Fascism 101..
82
posted on
03/12/2012 2:24:07 AM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("Better add another wing to The White House cause the Santorum clan is coming.")
To: Fred
Second hand unsubstantiated claims by a biased insignificant news source with no quotes--we have Newt and Mitt quotes on THEIR support for the unconstitutional individual mandate.
Nice try but if these lies had legs they would be loudly heralded by every MSM outlet in America.
83
posted on
03/12/2012 2:31:09 AM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("Better add another wing to The White House cause the Santorum clan is coming.")
To: Happy Rain
I think its kind of funny. These clowns come running to smear Rick Santorum with this crap from years ago, realize that Gingrich still has a mouthful and they’re trying to scrape it off their shoes and get away from it.
84
posted on
03/12/2012 4:31:11 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Fred
Agreed. If someone is looking for a topic to drop one candidate to select another, ethanol is not the deciding factor.
85
posted on
03/12/2012 4:49:52 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Happy Rain
>>that includes people who DON”T DEPEND on the GOVERNMENT---Fascism 101..<<
Anyone who has not made arrangements for themselves to cover medical expenses depends on the government or someone else when medical attention is needed. Santorum, Romney and Obama want the public to pay for their medical expenses but Newt wants them to make arrangements to take care of themselves. Which of those options looks more like fascism to you?
To: Cicero
Your post brings up why our country will not survive. We vote our wallets. In the end it will (actually, it HAS) kill us.
87
posted on
03/12/2012 8:29:53 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: katiedidit1
No wonder he did so well in Iowa. He could’ve been there that whole year talking ethanol mandates.
88
posted on
03/13/2012 9:57:51 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson