Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear
There are a few differences. I think the Patriot Act was a knee-jerk reaction to a successful assault on US soil and while it was overreaching and plain, old unconstitutional, at least there was a reason.
It is now over ten years later and, though there is always a threat nowadays, there is no imminent threat. Why now? Is it the gradual progression of the planned takeover or maybe a safety net in case it becomes obvious that they will lose control in the election?
19 posted on 03/18/2012 4:24:32 PM PDT by traintown57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: traintown57
"there is no imminent threat."

I agree, but then you and I seem to be in the minority here on FR.

I am continuously reminded here on FR that the Muslim threat is ever-present. They will never stop in their hopes of creating a worldwide Caliphate under Sharia Law. A world where all Christians will be reduced to dhimmi-tude.

So obviously it's a good thing that Obama renewed this EO ... isn't it?

23 posted on 03/18/2012 4:40:57 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson