Sorry, but this is logical fallacy. A so-called consensus of stupidity doesn’t make these judges right. Talk about the actual issues if you understand them. I already pointed out that the MDEC is making this same fallacy by trying to argue quantity rather than quality.
“Sorry, but this is logical fallacy. A so-called consensus of stupidity doesn’t make these judges right”
__
Sorry, the fallacy is your own. As I’ve said over and over, the consensus doesn’t prove they’re right. I never said it did.
I said that the existence of the consensus indicates that an understanding of the current state of the law is widely shared among judges. I have taken no stand on its correctness.
Why are you having so much trouble understanding that?