If I don't vote for the lesser of two evils and don't vote for either evil, I put good one vote ahead. Why don't you ABOs ever phrase it THAT way?
Because it doesn’t work out that way.
“If I don’t vote for the lesser of two evils and don’t vote for either evil, I put good one vote ahead. Why don’t you ABOs ever phrase it THAT way?”
Huh?
You DON’T vote at all, right? How does that put GOOD one vote ahead? It may make you feel better, but it does nothing to stop the GREATER EVIL.
If you do vote for the LESSER of two evils, your vote at least balances/cancels a vote for the GREATER evil.
I don’t know where to start with how flawed that logic is. Every vote that does not go to Romney puts the real evil another vote in the lead. The only “good” vote that is put ahead is in your mind.
It IS ABO, your guys and mine did not get the nomination, get that into your hard heads!
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” (Edmund Burke)
Not voting at all (or voting for someone lacking a snowball’s chance...) is doing nothing. The ABOs don’t like Romney, but recognize he’s the least bad & most capable option for stopping something much worse.
If you’re not with us, you’re against us. Even JR knows that, and has made peace.