Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2012 8:22:28 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: katiedidit1

What is “MarkAmerica”?


2 posted on 05/20/2012 8:26:07 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ( It is later than you think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

If he can’t attract the voters then its his own fault and nobody else shoulders any blame. He is a bad candidate to begin with.


3 posted on 05/20/2012 8:26:33 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1; Gator113; Marcella; onyx; caww; RitaOK; Jim Robinson; b9

“If Mitt Romney loses, it will be because he failed. He failed to be a conservative. He failed to insist on talking about Barack Obama’s radical associations. He failed to rally the base of the Republican party. He failed to motivate conservatives. He failed. If you want to blame me for a Romney loss, have at it, but I won’t accept blame. Here we have a candidate who saw no problem in hammering his Republican opponents in dishonest ways, but who now shrinks from talking about the truth of Barack Obama, and some wish to blame me?

If you will not call a monster by name in public, why would you be surprised if others will not view him in that light? After all, we elect Presidents because we expect them to tell us the truth even when it’s unpleasant. If we know the truth about Obama, but Romney won’t say it, what could be the justification? At what point does somebody step up and ask Romney: “Why won’t you talk about Obama’s radical associations?” Why, after saying he cannot tell the superPACs that support him what to do, when it came to Newt Gingrich, is he now going out of his way to dissociate himself from any discussion of Obama on this subject by those superPACs? What he’s done is to “call off the dogs” on this, something he refused to do when it came to Gingrich just a few months ago, laughing it off as the nature of politics.”


4 posted on 05/20/2012 8:27:04 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

That’t right. It’s all your fault and we haven’t even gotten through May yet!


5 posted on 05/20/2012 8:27:25 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1
Don’t tell me Romney wants to win but doesn’t want to talk about Reverend Jeremiah Wright, or Bill Ayers, or the whole rogues’ gallery of philosophical villainy that accompanies Barack Obama...hmmm - maybe that's why Romney has gone from a 50 to 42 percent lead over Obama in last weekend's Rasmussen poll of likely voters to today's 46 to 44 deficit - as good an explanation as any......
12 posted on 05/20/2012 8:50:34 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

I will not vote for Romney, and that’s Romney’s fault.
Period.


13 posted on 05/20/2012 8:51:31 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

Romney was never after the conservative voters, but was out to crush conservative candidates, all who had more love for country than money to run on. He made deals on issues and strategy with the GOP leaders, funded their campaigns, even some newbies, far in advance of even announcing his own run, buying their silence then, and their support now, all in place in time to repel and reject any other candidates.

He is now playing the issues for the Independents only, and believes any time spent on character issues and the communist associations let’s Obama off the hook on the economy, which is supposedly Romney’s strong suit and Obama’s weakest, so that is the only pony Romney wants to ride, until he falls behind and is forced then to go negative.

Republicans don’t want to lead. They want to oppose and get richly compensated for it. Newt would have made them go to work like he always did and they hated him for it, and he would have kicked Obama to the curb, which horrified the GOP (Grand Old Posers) who couldn’t deal with the fall out and the restructuring.

Myth is PERFECT for them, as they want to move the party to the Left, obviously. Santorum never earned the political gravitas to pull it off, never had run squat, but for his mouth, like Biden II, so the powers showed him the back of their hand too. (And after all those years of ingratiating himself!)


23 posted on 05/20/2012 10:12:34 PM PDT by RitaOK (I WILL vote against Romney! Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: katiedidit1

I am a conservative an don’t give two dead flies about
Romney calling out BO regarding Ayers & Wright.
Didn’t work last time & won’t this time. Still think
Kerry was a fool for rehashing a sitting POTUS mil-
tary record in 04. Would love for the Romney cam-
paign to challenge the MSM when needed and ap-
propriate. I’d like to see Romney get under BO’s
skin in the debates. BO will not survive the light
of truth shining down on his phony presidency
and lightweight Mitt has to get past himself to
make that happen.


24 posted on 05/20/2012 10:15:34 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson