Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This is a story of a child who was not supposed to live. A child who has a condition that most doctors would refuse to provide treatment for and let to die, based on "futile care" theory. A story of a child, who in the Netherlands, may have been euthanized based on the guidelines of the Groningen Protocol, because she would be viewed as a "life unworthy of life."

And these miracles will disappear if Obama has his way.

1 posted on 06/01/2012 4:35:47 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 06/01/2012 4:36:55 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 06/01/2012 4:38:21 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
What a heartwarming story. Here is one thing that I don't understand about those who claim that caring about a child such as this requires either allowing her to die, or actually killing her. How can we discover a way to treat or cure this illness if we don't treat these babies? How is this different from any other disease? If we know that a family carries the tendency to cancer, Tay Sachs, Sickle Cell Anemia, diabetes, and so on, should we deny them treatment? No!

Isn't this what medicine is all about?

7 posted on 06/01/2012 5:09:10 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

What a darling little girl. Every baby is completely helpless and will die without constant care from his parents. A child with a genetic or other handicap just needs more intense care.

My Kathleen inches around the floors on her back, too. Why roll over when that just puts your nose on the carpet?


8 posted on 06/01/2012 5:22:22 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Make sure you notice that I'm being subtly ironic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

My child had choroid plexus cysts when in the womb and we were told that it was an indicator for this. We were also told that many women have abortions because of the presence of the cysts but that the cysts often disappear. One women we were told had been pregnant multiple times and each time chose abortion. Finally, the last time cysts were detected and the woman chose life and the baby was fine. Sad when you consider how many women probably choose abortion even when the baby is fine.

I should add, the doctor also said our daughter would have a long narrow face. You guessed it-her face is short and round.


9 posted on 06/01/2012 5:36:30 PM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

That’s nothing. The real horror is disomy X syndrome.


10 posted on 06/01/2012 6:30:47 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


15 posted on 06/03/2012 12:19:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Thank you for posting this. Another example of why killing babies is never the right solution.


16 posted on 06/04/2012 4:28:05 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This child is a miracle and is beautiful. That being said, some people would argue that since we as a society are now sharing the costs of health care it is irresponsible to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars keeping a child like this alive. They cannot hope to achieve a reasonable quality of life and will almost certainly die before the age of 5. Is it selfish for the parents to want to keep the child alive with aggressive therapies (gastric tube feeding, constant airway monitoring ect.) Perhaps it is more humane to let the child pass with less aggressive intervention. This is not an easy question to answer.


17 posted on 10/08/2014 9:49:10 AM PDT by ReasonableDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson