Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Are The 8 RINOs Who Paved The Way For The Architect Of Roe v. Wade?
America's Conservative News ^ | 06/11/2012 | America's Conservative News

Posted on 06/11/2012 7:01:47 PM PDT by ElIguana

(ACN Staff) Eight Republicans-in-Name-Only (RINOs) joined Democrats on Monday and paved the way for Andrew David Hurwitz, the man who has been called the "Architect of Roe v. Wade" in leftists circles, to take a seat on the federal court.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeamericaonline.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: hurwitz; prolife; rinos

1 posted on 06/11/2012 7:02:00 PM PDT by ElIguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ElIguana
Quelle surprise:

John McCain (RINO-AZ), Jon Kyl (RINO-AZ), Lamar Alexander (RINO-TN), Scott Brown (RINO-MA), Olympia Snowe (RINO-ME), Susan Collins (RINO-ME), Richard Lugar (RINO-IN), Lisa Murkowski (RINO-AK).

2 posted on 06/11/2012 7:05:37 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

8 RINOS and 1 leftist, anti-life Jew


3 posted on 06/11/2012 7:11:48 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Yea, familiar (and vomit-inducing) names.

Collins, Graham, Gregg, Lugar and Snowe voted to confirm Kagan; and

Alexander, Bond, Collins, Graham, Gregg, Lugar, Martinez, Snowe and Voinovich voted to confirm the Wide Latino

4 posted on 06/11/2012 7:17:41 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The usual suspects.

I actually hope Warren beats Scott Brown.

Better stabbed by an enemy than a faux friend.


5 posted on 06/11/2012 7:35:59 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElIguana
And note the committee vote as well:

on March 1, 2012, his nomination was reported to the floor of the Senate by a vote of 13 ayes to 5 nays.[18] All ten Democratic Senators voted aye along with Republican Senators Tom Coburn, Lindsey Graham and Jon Kyl, while Republican Senators John Cornyn, Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Mike Lee and Jeff Sessions voted no. (from Wikipedia)

I thought at least Coburn was better than that.
6 posted on 06/11/2012 7:59:02 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("You forget, it isn't who you claim, but instead, who claims you. We don't claim you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

no. coburn is not a conservative. he just talks the talk. whenever he gets a chance to vote on principle (e.g., SB 510, the food takeover bill), he punts. he needs to go, with boehner, cantor, mcconnell and all their assorted cronies, first opportunity.


7 posted on 06/11/2012 8:41:33 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ElIguana
There almost certainly would never have been a Roe versus Wade if a number of liberal Republicans hadn't joined with the Democrats in November, 1969, to kill President Richard Nixon's nomination of Clement Haynsworth, a conservative, whom he had chosen to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Associate Justice Abe Fortas. We call such Republicans "RINOs" today, but back then they comprised a major faction of the GOP.

These Republicans provided the margin of victory for Haynsworth's opponents. They included Mew York's two Senators Jake "the Snake" Javits and Charlie Goodell, Oregon's Mark Hatfield and Bob Packwood, and Pennsylvania's Dick Schweiker and Hugh Scott--whom the GOP solons had for some reason chosen as their Minority Leader despite his opposition to much of President Nixon's agenda. Other Republican Senators who deserted the president were Margaret Chase Smith (R-Me.), Clifford Case (R-NJ), Mac Mathias (R-Md.), Chuck Percy (R-Ill.), Ed Brooke (R-Mass.) and William Saxbe (R-Ohio)--whom Nixon would later name as his Attorney General over the protests of conservatives.

8 posted on 06/11/2012 8:49:44 PM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElIguana

Well, they used to say that the Satanic worshipers had to have babies blood for their rituals.

How anyone can slay a baby for the convienence of their social lives is beyond me. Baby blood on your conscience, can anything be worse?

Satan smiles I’m sure. He got his baby blood, the pure little ones who never sinned once.

Yet, it’s all ‘okay’ with so many people. Just a matter of choice, is all.


9 posted on 06/11/2012 9:46:48 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
The usual suspects. You can bet they'll be voting alongside those whose party they actually belong to.
10 posted on 06/11/2012 9:59:12 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: twister881

None of those eight are Jewish.


11 posted on 06/12/2012 2:28:02 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson