Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Touting Obamacare, Obama Prefers to Spend Taxpayers’ Money [Revolting Corruption!]
The Weekly Standard ^ | June 18, 2012 | JEFFREY H. ANDERSON

Posted on 06/19/2012 9:23:12 PM PDT by Steelfish

When Touting Obamacare, Obama Prefers to Spend Taxpayers’ Money JUN 19, 2012 • BY JEFFREY H. ANDERSON

As the Los Angeles Times reports, for every $1 that President Obama’s campaign has spent in support of Obamacare, his administration has spent another $65 in taxpayers’ money.

The Times writes that the Obama administration has spent $46 million of taxpayers’ money in support of Obama’s centerpiece legislation, while the Obama campaign has spent only $703,000. That’s a 65-to-1 ratio of matching funds, with taxpayers doing the matching.

Highlighting the overhaul’s unpopularity, $76 million has been spent in support of Obamacare over the past 3-1/2 years, while $250 million — more than three times as much — has been spent in opposition to it. But the vast majority of the $76 million that has been spent in support of Obamacare — $46 million — has been spent by the Obama administration at taxpayers’ expense.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/19/2012 9:23:25 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Libturds can dish it out but they can’t take it...


2 posted on 06/19/2012 9:49:01 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Despise Obama?

Not as much as we do at The Obama Clarifier!

http://obamaclarifier.blogspot.com/


3 posted on 06/19/2012 11:11:40 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Prediction: If the mandate is struck down, the Obama administration will begin to use taxpayer money to bribe state governments into adopting an individual mandate, because a state mandate will still be constitutional.


4 posted on 06/20/2012 4:42:04 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson