Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Strikes Corporate Campaign Spending Limits. Will Texas Law Change? Good for Tom Delay?
Texas Conservative Republican News ^ | 6/25/2012 | David Bellow

Posted on 06/25/2012 10:08:47 AM PDT by davidbellow

Will Texas Have to Change Its Campaign Spending Law? Will Tom Delay have his Conviction Overturned?

According to the AP, the Supreme Court today has (again) ruled that corporations have the right to spend freely to advocate for or against candidates for state and local offices.

The justices struck down a Montana law limiting corporate campaign spending, but this case will have a ripple effect on all other states.

Texas is a state that does not allow corporations to spend money in Texas state and local election.

In fact, former Speaker of the united States House of Representatives, Tom Delay, did not even give corporate money to Texas elections but he was prosecuted by a liberal from Austin simply because he give money to the RNC which possibly freed up RNC money to be given to Texas elections. Based on that, this liberal prosecutor said that Tom Delay broke Texas law by giving corporate money to Texas elections.

SOOO, not that the Supreme Court has ruled that it is unconstitutional to limit corporate spending in state and local elections, will Texas have to change its laws to allow corporate spending? If not they might set themselves up for a losing battle in the Supreme Court.

Also, will this ruling have any effect on appeals that Tom Delay has made in a case where he was prosecuted for something that the Supreme Court has said is constitutionally protected?


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; supremecourt; texas; tomdelay

1 posted on 06/25/2012 10:09:01 AM PDT by davidbellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davidbellow

oops, I guess I have written too many articles about Texas House Speaker Joe Straus... I automatically typed Speaker when I typed in Tom Delay but of course he was the Majority Leader. I just noticed the typo after reading it when it posted to FR.


2 posted on 06/25/2012 10:27:54 AM PDT by davidbellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidbellow

It was a long delay but perhaps Delay now has grounds for appeal.


3 posted on 06/25/2012 10:28:29 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "One can argue about whose fault it is, but not ... whose responsibility it is: it's his")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson