Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Actually, in this case, the judge may be legally correct.

I beg to differ, if the following is accurate:
“the… nomination of any person to office…may be contested in the circuit court…by any elector or any taxpayer…”
then it says that the nomination to any person may be challenged; it does not restrict the whom of who is nominated, or the how.
The Office of President of the United States is an Office, obviously. So it, too, must be challengable.

There could be argument that Obama has not won the primaries (or has he? I don't know) and is therefore not yet nominated…

38 posted on 07/08/2012 4:50:20 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
You are voting for electors not president. Barack is not on the ballot - your fellow Floridians are - as electors.

perhaps you should challenge the eligibility of the electors as being obviously insane to have their names on the ballot for obama in the first instance.

60 posted on 07/08/2012 6:47:00 PM PDT by lag along
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson