Interesting that many of the athletes appearing in the ESPN's Body Issue admitted to feeling uncomfortable posing nude.
I believe it's because, in their spirits, they know it's wrong to publicly expose themselves, particularly to the millions of under-age kids who look up to them.
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Most of the athletes were at least doing a relevant action shot. Gronkowski’s photos were just about getting naked.
2 posted on
07/11/2012 8:45:36 AM PDT by
Flightdeck
(If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Bawney Fwank has ordered twelve subscriptions.
3 posted on
07/11/2012 8:45:46 AM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Spot on article. I’ve loathed ESPN since I stopped drinking the NFL Known Felons League’s Koolaid. They’re always first to cry racism, many times before Jesse and Al Sharpie have their busses warmed up and loaded with their rent-a-mobs. I sure wish Fox Sports Channel would have survived. They were honest about their racial bias and sometimes frankly embarrassed.
4 posted on
07/11/2012 8:51:10 AM PDT by
STD
([You must help] people in theÂ…feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
The Daily Caller is guilty of the same, I noticed. Use to post there but complained against the soft porn posings and dropped them. Irritated me no end the lack of respect for conservatives on a red meat news site.
5 posted on
07/11/2012 8:54:59 AM PDT by
RitaOK
(NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
I can’t really weigh in until I see the offending pictures. I am sure I am not alone.
6 posted on
07/11/2012 8:55:05 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Guns Walked -- People Died -- Holder Lied -- Obama Golfed (thanks, Secret Agent Man))
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Uh oh! Looks like Michelangelo was into "soft core porn" as well! And those first Olympics -when athletes competed in the nude - that was hard-core!
7 posted on
07/11/2012 8:58:58 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Hmmmmm.....seems gay to me.
8 posted on
07/11/2012 9:06:14 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
It's been done.
9 posted on
07/11/2012 9:16:59 AM PDT by
Johnny B.
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
I buy ESPN for the articles . . .
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
I think the point was that they DIDN’T expose themselves. You don’t see anymore of any of the athletes then you would see at the beach. Porn depicts(soft) or displays(hard) sexual activity, it’s not just pictures of scantily clad people.
13 posted on
07/11/2012 10:09:51 AM PDT by
Blackyce
(President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
I find it absolutely hillarious that you would write such a fine article denigrating ESPN for having pictures of naked men, then do it yourself.
Quote from your article, "Indeed, the nude athletic bodies on public dispaly in the Mag tempt readers to look upon them lustfully. And causing others to stumble into sin is itself a sin."
You should not criticize others for things that you also do, especially when you believe it is wrong.
14 posted on
07/11/2012 10:15:50 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
(There's Two Choices... Stand Up and Be Counted ... Or Line Up and Be Numbered .)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
ESPN the magazine has always been gay porno. America’s sports cult is an embarasment.
17 posted on
07/11/2012 10:34:10 AM PDT by
junta
("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson