Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

Cross-posted from:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2913366/posts?q=1&;page=59

To: Meet the New Boss

“In January 1964, Stanley Ann’s divorce petition alleged that they had a child BHO II. However, Obama Sr. never made answer to the divorce petition and he did not appear at the hearing in March 1964. It is notable that Stanley Ann did not seek child support against Obama Sr.; she may have known she was on shaky ground as to paternity and did not press the matter.”
However, in April or May he told the INS in Baltimore he was “separated” from his wife who was in the Philippines IIRC. This might be further evidence he was trying to intentionally distance himself from both Stanley and Barry and he may not have known about all of the notes in the INS files back in HI. He may not have known he was divorced, given all of the partying he was doing with Ruth on top of his studies. Ruth’s parents were hysterical and calling Harvard and the INS trying to get him kicked out of the country.

Reading your comment about the divorce decree, I am wondering if the reason that child support was not adjudicated was that the BC requested for the divorce by Stanley Ann’s attorney from Kenya never arrived in time, if the new revelation on the Daily Pen that there is one in the Kew, UK BNA (archive) is true indicated by an index of a male baby born to BHO Sr in 1961.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2908395/posts?q=1&;page=1#1

“It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.

“Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama’s foreign birth records.”

One of the most seductive things about that Bomford BC was that the date it was prepared of February 1964, IIRC, fit it being a document requested for the HI divorce court.

Now Daily Pen says that “an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB” for Obama was the template for the Bomford forgery “is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA.”

If Stanley Ann was hidden away in Kenya to deliver baby Barry, witnesses by Gramma Sarah as she claimed and registered in the colonial records not in the Kew, UK BNA, I think it is highly probable that BHO Sr. would know about that series of events. And he could be very motivated to hide it!

59 posted on Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07:07 AM by Seizethecarp


1,365 posted on 08/01/2012 10:10:41 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp; Fred Nerks; David; Brown Deer; LucyT

Quote from Seizethecarp: “One of the most seductive things about that Bomford BC was that the date it was prepared of February 1964, IIRC, fit it being a document requested for the HI divorce court.”

As I have pointed out before you DO NOT have to provide a BC of your children to get a divorce.”

I have done a “Do It Yourself Divorce” in Washington State for my daughter. You get a packet with all the legal documents required along with the “Instructions”. At no time is a copy of your “Marriage License” or “Birth Certificates” asked for. Also my mother divorced my father in 1955 with legal help and I know she didn’t have to present Birth Certificates for her children as she never had any in her possession. In fact when I applied for Social Security I had to order one from my birth state.

The reason a page is missing when someone requests to see a copy of the divorce papers is due to a “CONFIDENTIAL INFO FORM” The clerks are instructed not to put any of that information in a public access file.

Below is the form that is filled out if any of those reasons occur.

Confidential Information Form (INFO)
County: Cause Number:

Court Clerk: This is a Restricted Access Document

Do not file in a public access file.

Divorce/Separation/Invalidity/Nonparental Custody/Paternity/Modifications Sexual Assault Other
Domestic Violence Antiharassment Information Change (Check if you are updating information)
A restraining order or protection order is in effect protecting the petitioner the respondent the children.
The health, safety, or liberty of a party or child would be jeopardized by disclosure of address information because:

The following information about the parties is required in all cases:
(Use the Addendum To Confidential Information Form to list additional parties or children)
Petitioner Information Type or Print Only Respondent Information
Name (Last, First, Middle)
Name (Last, First, Middle)

Race
Sex
Birthdate
Race
Sex Birthdate
Driver’s Lic. or Identicard (# and State)

Driver’s Lic. or Identicard (# and State), (or, if unavailable, residential address)

Mailing Address (P.O. Box/Street, City, State, Zip)

Mailing Address (P.O. Box/Street, City, State, Zip)

Relationship to Child(ren)

Relationship to Child(ren)

The following information is required if there are children involved in the proceeding. (Soc. Sec. No. is not required for petitions in protection order cases (Domestic Violence/Antiharassment/Sexual Assault).)
1) Child’s Name (Last, First, Middle)
Child’s Race/Sex/Birthdate
Child’s Soc. Sec. No. (If required)
Child’s Present Address or Whereabouts

2) Child’s Name (Last, First, Middle)
Child’s Race/Sex/Birthdate
Child’s Soc. Sec. No. (If required)
Child’s Present Address or Whereabouts

List the names and present addresses of the persons with whom the child(ren) lived during the last five years:

List the names and present addresses of any person besides you and the respondent who has physical custody of, or claims rights of custody or visitation with, the child(ren):

Except for petitions in protection order cases (Domestic Violence/Antiharassment/
Sexual Assault), the following information is required:
Petitioner’s Information Respondent’s Information
Soc. Sec. No.: Soc. Sec. No.:
Residential Address (Street, City, State, Zip)

Residential Address (Street, City, State, Zip)

E-mail Address: E-mail Address:
Telephone No.: ( ) Telephone No.: ( )
Employer: Employer:
Empl. Address:

Empl. Address:
Empl. Phone No.: ( ) Empl. Phone No.: ( )
For Nonparental Custody Petitions only, list other Adults in Petitioner(s) household (Name/DOB):

Additional information:

Addendum(s) To Confidential Information Form attached. List other parties or children in Addendum(s).
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the above information is true and accurate concerning myself and is accurate to the best of my knowledge as to the other party, or is unavailable. The information is unavailable because
.
Signed on __________________ (Date) at ____________________________________ (City and State).

Petitioner/Respondent
ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FORM (AD)
County: Cause Number: Do not file in a
Court Clerk: This is a Restricted Access Document public access file.
The following information about additional parties is required in all cases.
Additional Petitioner Information Type or Print Only Additional Respondent Information
Name (Last, First, Middle)
Name (Last, first, Middle)

Race
Sex
Birthdate
Race
Sex
Birthdate

Drivers Lic. or Identicard (# and State)

Drivers Lic. or Identicard (# and State), (or, if unavailable, residential address)

Mailing Address (P.O. Box/Street, City, State, Zip)

Mailing Address (P.O. Box/Street, City, State, Zip)

Relationship to Child(ren)
Relationship to Child(ren)
The following information is required if there are additional children involved in the proceeding.
(Soc. Sec. No. is not required for petitions in protection order cases (Domestic Violence/Antiharassment/Sexual Assault).)
3) Child’s Name (Last, First, Middle)
Child’s Race/Sex/Birthdate
Child’s Soc. Sec. No. (If required)
Child’s Present Address or
Whereabouts
4) Child’s Name (Last, First, Middle)
Child’s Race/Sex/Birthdate
Child’s Soc. Sec. No. (If required)
Child’s Present Address or
Whereabouts
Except for petitions in protection order cases (Domestic Violence/Antiharassment/
Sexual Assault), the following information is required:
Additional Petitioner Information Additional Respondent Information
Soc. Sec. No.: Soc. Sec. No.:
Residential Address (Street, City, State, Zip)

Residential Address (Street, City, State, Zip)

E-mail Address: E-mail Address:
Telephone No.: ( ) Telephone No.: ( )
Employer: Employer:
Empl. Address:

Empl. Address:

Empl. Phone No.: ( ) Empl. Phone No.: ( )

Here is a link to the “Do It Yourself” Documents and Instructions.

http://www.lawhelp.org/documents/1475213240EN.pdf?stateabbrev=/WA/

Everything you put down you SWEAR TO as being correct, so you have already told them the names dates etc of your childen. Therefore the court DOES NOT need more papers.

Now just in case you say, well that is Washington State, here is a link to Hawaii’s divorce packet. Let me know if you find where it says you have to supply BC.

http://www.easy-divorce.com/Hawaii-Forms.htm

I hope this posts in paragraphs as I am not using HTML formating


1,374 posted on 08/01/2012 11:07:54 PM PDT by Spunky (Those)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
It is notable that Stanley Ann did not seek child support against Obama Sr.; she may have known she was on shaky ground as to paternity and did not press the matter

Most likely she didn't because she remarried before the divorce was even filed (according to one of her passport applications) so support wasn't a concern. It's not like she or Barry had had any contact with dear ol' dad, so why start now. Besides, it'd have been a waste of time since he was at Harvard or soon in Kenya and in those days there were no attorneys who would bother going after him for nonpayment.

1,396 posted on 08/02/2012 5:29:14 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson