Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?

To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -

and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...

1 posted on 08/16/2012 10:22:50 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: scottjewell

At least they didn’t say “stands behind”.


2 posted on 08/16/2012 10:25:20 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

I have no use for these groups, but the response was appropriate. If they didn’t issue such a response, we would (rightly) accuse them of being supportive.

They perform plenty of evil, but supporting FRC against direct violence was not evil.


4 posted on 08/16/2012 10:26:42 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

The Family Research Council shooter’s actions cannot be separated from the agenda or true motives of the Homosexual Agenda Movement and all are responsible.


5 posted on 08/16/2012 10:27:49 AM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

Just imagine if the ideology of the victim institution and the shooter were reversed...??? The media would be on the air non-stop showing the “hate” from the Right.

The double-standard of the media is the size of the Grand Canon.


6 posted on 08/16/2012 10:28:59 AM PDT by kjo (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

They’re in ‘cover your ass’ mode


11 posted on 08/16/2012 10:34:26 AM PDT by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

This situation kind of puts them in a tough spot between banning gans or supporting same-sex marriage. Maybe if the guy had also worn a pro-Obamacare T-shirt it would have tipped the scales in his favor.


13 posted on 08/16/2012 10:39:20 AM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
a non-profit organization that fights anti-gay religious extremism

Nice to see WaPo's not editorializing. /sarc

14 posted on 08/16/2012 10:39:26 AM PDT by mykroar (October race riots bring November martial law. Voting postponed for your safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
The shooter should have dressed himself up with a few more liberal causes to make sure the left would have his back on this.


15 posted on 08/16/2012 10:41:11 AM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
There are unconfirmed reports that the shooting was ideologically motivated.

they are rafting on the river of denial.

17 posted on 08/16/2012 10:43:22 AM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
A nice attempt, but perhaps too expedient?

To my thinking, it is convenient to display a show of "solidarity" to make one's own group image appear noble -

and only after harassing and reviling people as belonging to hate groups, and stifling any words of dissent for years....Perhaps a case of "too little too late"...


No, this statement was the right thing for them to do. If they didn't say anything we'd be all over them for failing to condemn the shooter's actions.

There's probably some truth in their statement in that they're condemning violence. Many of the people in these groups are also pacifist types.

I'm not endorsing any of these groups or their actions, just saying that in addition to any cynical purpose to their statement (like trying to appear noble) there is probably a genuine horror at the violence of the action, if not in these groups' leadership, then at least with some of the members.

And just to throw this out there:
I know a gay man who's very in-your-face about it, and downright virulent at social events, always steering the conversation toward "the Cause" no matter what people are talking about. His reaction to this shooting was to angrily lament the fact that the guard didn't "do everyone a favor and put a few in that f***er's chest."
20 posted on 08/16/2012 11:01:14 AM PDT by verum ago (A good physical therapist is half friend, half sadist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
... At this time, no major LGBT groups claim to have a direct connection to [the shooter].

Other than the fact that he worked for one.

21 posted on 08/16/2012 11:03:54 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

Slightly better than Muslims’ regular failure to refute terrorism.


25 posted on 08/16/2012 11:38:50 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (You didn't build that. The private sector is doing fine. We tried our plan and it worked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

I just saw the FRC spokesman talking about how the SPLC “created the environment” for the attack by labling them a “hate group”. Interesting because that’s the term the SPLC has used in suing various skinhead and Klan groups. I would dearly love to see the SPLC hoisted on their own petard.


26 posted on 08/16/2012 11:55:23 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

But they still consider FRC and FoTF to be “hate groups”.


27 posted on 08/16/2012 11:59:19 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell
BINGO!

I called this one!

"Some attempted to connect the shooter to the Chick-Fil-A boycotts based on material found in his backpack, as well as link him to LGBT organizations..."

Obviously confirmed by the sympathy press releases.

And more proof that they are starting more and more to respond to the conservative media - even if they don't wanna admit it.

31 posted on 08/16/2012 12:32:30 PM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

Interesting how WaPo is scrubbing all the comments. They scrubbed mine. And say there is only one comment despite how long the story has been up.

Can you imagine what all the real comments are saying that they feel they have to delete every one of them? There must be thousands of them by now.

The Left hopefully soon is in fully panic retreat mode. People in this country are finally getting angry about the lawlessness of the Left, from Obama on down.


33 posted on 08/16/2012 7:14:23 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scottjewell

They can keep their “solidarity” crap. They are directly responsible for this attack through their homoNazism.

Sorry, but this is a war. You don’t accept condolences from the enemy.


35 posted on 08/18/2012 7:08:20 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson