Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There are no ‘assault weapons’
Monachus Lex ^ | August 20, 2012 | John Pierce

Posted on 08/20/2012 7:14:38 PM PDT by JohnPierce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Vermont Lt
You are probably correct.

Life is guaranteed to result in death.

21 posted on 08/20/2012 8:38:29 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce

As they say on National Palisimain Radio, “Lets’s do the numbers.”

100 rounds in 3 seconds = 33.3 per second.
33.3 X 60 = 1998 rounds per minute.

1998 rounds per minute = rotary cannon, NOT a mere ‘assault weapon.”


22 posted on 08/20/2012 9:01:18 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Both great!


23 posted on 08/20/2012 9:17:38 PM PDT by X-spurt (It is truly time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Could you make a video of you lighting off that 50 cal BMG and post it? Then tell us how the hand reattachment surgery?

Use to shoot a Ruger Super Blackhawk 44 mag and two hands was mandatory. That BMG would need to welded to an anvil!!


24 posted on 08/20/2012 9:56:53 PM PDT by X-spurt (It is truly time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

Probably not. They know banning shotguns will never fly in a hunting nation. First they have to re-define (as always) “assault weapons” and get them banned.

So it’s likely they will keep the shotgun thing about Aurora - if it’s true - secret. Their objective for now is “assault weapons.”

The libs/communists are very patient for achieving one step at a time and not over-reaching. Gradual conquest...the old frog in the slowly warming pot theory....works every time.

Look how far they’ve taken us already? They are more than 50% toward their goal of taking us over.....

But putting Obama in office just may have been an overreach......let’s hope and pray so......


25 posted on 08/20/2012 9:57:42 PM PDT by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

I want to read this more carefully later


26 posted on 08/21/2012 1:09:18 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (government health officials seem to have the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
the term ‘assault weapon’ is not a technical term describing an actual type of firearm but rather a political term denoting whatever firearm the anti-gun crowd wishes to demonize, regulate, and ban at a given point in time.

It’s worse than that – given the definitions:

Assault
1 to attack someone in a violent way

Weapon
1 something that you use to fight with or attack someone with, such as a knife, bomb, or gun

An assault weapon could be any object that could be used as a weapon to assault or attack someone. It could apply to almost anything deemed to be a Weapon.

27 posted on 08/21/2012 5:10:31 AM PDT by BerserkPatriot (Why is the Democratic National Committee waging a War on liberty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
There are no ‘assault weapons’

I wouldn't say that.

height="450">

28 posted on 08/21/2012 12:34:08 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
100 rounds in 3 seconds = 33.3 per second.
33.3 X 60 = 1998 rounds per minute.

1998 rounds per minute = rotary cannon, NOT a mere ‘assault weapon.”

Nah. Just your old run-of-the-mill MG42,M53 SARAK, or MG3 with the light bolt.

29 posted on 08/21/2012 12:39:47 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

30 posted on 08/21/2012 12:52:25 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: archy

Any single barrel weapon will overheat rapidly under sustained fire near 2,000 rounds per minute. I was not, of course, referring to burst fire.


31 posted on 08/21/2012 6:29:48 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
Any single barrel weapon will overheat rapidly under sustained fire near 2,000 rounds per minute. I was not, of course, referring to burst fire.

Well, the Villar-Perosa of 1914 managed about 1500 RPM, and in a twin-gun configuration was a reasonably effective defensive weapon for the aircraft of the early days of WWI. Barrel overheating was minimalized in three ways: the weapon fired from an open bolt using a pistol-caliber cartridge, from a limited capacity magazine, and rode in the 100 mph+ airflow of the observer's position in the aircraft.

The MG42 derived beltfed guns get around barrel overheating with frequent barrel changes, around every 500 rounds or so per my experience with German tank crews, who run off longer bursts than their Infantry countertparts who have to haul ammo on their backs. The WWI German Gast MG, chambered for the standard German 7,92mm rifle/MG cartridge, managed 1600 RPM [single mechanism/double barrelled, and again, magazine fed [2x 180-round drums.]

By the end of WWII, the Germans had machine cannon for aircraft developed to the point that two or three projectiles were in the barrel at the same time. See Chinn for details.

32 posted on 08/21/2012 6:48:52 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: archy
When you absotively posilutely have to take out a room of Colonels and Generals in the shortest amount of time...The MAC-10 (personal preference in .45acp.as ahown)


33 posted on 08/21/2012 9:58:46 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson