Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Starman417

Unemployment is not at 8.3%, it is much higher. 8.3% represents only the number of people who are actively receiving unemployment assistance. It does not count the huge number of high school and college graduates who have yet to find their first job, it does not count the people who have run out their unemployment benefits, and it does not count the self-employed whose businesses have failed in the past four years.

The government’s own U-6 (total) unemployment figure was FIFTEEN PERCENT for July 2012.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm/

Stop believing the lies from the media!!!!!


2 posted on 08/24/2012 12:05:19 PM PDT by MeganC (The Cinemark theatre in Aurora, CO is a 'Gun Free Zone'. Spread the word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC

[begin sarcasm]

Does it include those folks who have sat around on their arounds for the last 99 weeks and now their unemployment is over so they’re applying for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or (assuming they worked long enough) Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)?

[end sarcasm]


3 posted on 08/24/2012 12:19:56 PM PDT by upchuck ("Definition of 'racist:' someone that is winning an argument with a liberal." ~ Peter Brimelow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC
If the participation rate was as high as it was the day O’Bumbler took office, the U-3 unemployment rate would be 11%.
6 posted on 08/24/2012 1:23:07 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson