Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/29/2012 9:50:25 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MichCapCon

Money laundering.


2 posted on 08/29/2012 9:53:43 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

This is all a mute point! With out liberals help and give 17 years, technology will be such that these numbers and goals will be irrelevant!


3 posted on 08/29/2012 10:02:44 AM PDT by big bad easter bunny (If it weren't for coffee I would still be living with my parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon
The study authors' did not include the estimated costs of the mandate in their respective models.

That has been the modus operandi for the last 50 years.

Tossing money around willy nilly without concern for where the money to pay for it is or where it would come from.

One of these days the economy is going to say "ENOUGH" and get even!/s

5 posted on 08/29/2012 10:20:51 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

Not going to happen. Put up all of the windmills you want, they cannot supply a reliable source of power. It’s a money laundering scheme perpetated by the green lobby, plain and simple. If you want cheap power, drill for all of that natural gas and oil that’s sitting under the Great Lakes. It’s their, ask the Canadians. Michigan has been destroyed by the socialist liberal democrats, turning it into the graveyard state. I had to leave there after living there for 40 years. I couldn’t stand watching an industrial powerhouse being reduced to ruin anymore. Point the finger at who you want for the decline of industrialization, but there’s plenty of people here and elsewhere who cheered it’s demise. Oh, and for the blame the union crowd, the unions weren’t the sole reason for the downfall, they only played their part as useful idiots.


6 posted on 08/29/2012 10:38:44 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ..
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Al Gore on the Weather: 'A Nature Hike Through the Book of Revelations'

Why The Global Warming Agenda Is Wrong

Big-Picture Green Agenda

GOP platform slams military's focus on climate change

GOP platform opposes U.N. global tax plans

Global Warming Straining U.S. Electrical Grid

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

7 posted on 08/29/2012 9:08:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon
It is a complex computer model that lay people cannot understand or evaluate, and it has important scientific merits. Thus, the frequent government claims that the best scientific model available shows that x thousand jobs will be created by the project helps to carry the day.

If the model is "too complicated for me to understand" I assume that means that it doesn't work or that it's just agenda-driven bullshit, and they're trying to cover that up. If the model were valid, I'd certainly be able to understand it. Therefore, when they start chanting this crap about it being too difficult to understand, the only rational thing to do is, not to ignore, but to count it as points AGAINST whatever they want you to do. Otherwise they're in a "nothing to lose" scenario and they might as well at least try lying to you.

8 posted on 08/29/2012 10:56:34 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MichCapCon

so for each job year it will cost someone else 4-5 lost job years.

Idiots.


10 posted on 08/30/2012 8:21:38 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson