To: John Semmens
Structure is what elections are all about — at least the outcomes.
2 posted on
09/03/2012 11:08:10 AM PDT by
KC Burke
(Plain Conservative opinions and common sense correction for thirteen years.)
To: John Semmens
Didn’t seem to bother him in ‘08. Hypocrite.
3 posted on
09/03/2012 11:08:14 AM PDT by
Qwackertoo
(Romney/Ryan 2012 The Future of Our Children and Their Children are at stake.)
To: John Semmens
4 posted on
09/03/2012 11:09:30 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: John Semmens
I fear that an executive order will soon be published making this semi-satire, the law.
5 posted on
09/03/2012 11:10:02 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: John Semmens
“Comprehensive” First Amendment “reform”.
6 posted on
09/03/2012 11:11:47 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Had enough of the freaks running the show yet?)
To: John Semmens
Just like the 2nd Amendment is not about protecting the right to hunt, the 1st Amendment is not about protecting pornography.
I thought that oDumbo was a constitutional scholar??? The 1st Amendment was written specifically so that we can say anything about the government, and the 2nd Amendment was written so that we could change that government if they decide to stop us.
To: John Semmens
Obama said. “Non-candidates shouldn’t be allowed to sow confusion, particularly during this critical period.
How Hitler of him,however he would not have MSM to pimp his ideas.
8 posted on
09/03/2012 11:12:30 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: John Semmens
9 posted on
09/03/2012 11:12:36 AM PDT by
malia
To: John Semmens
Although the First Amendment has been perverted to also protect pornography, it still functions perfectly in protecting political speech. No amendment to the First Amendment is necessary!
To: John Semmens
First Sentence "All Presidents with the name of Barrack Heusein Obama must keep it zipped..."
Except when visiting the 57th State!
13 posted on
09/03/2012 11:28:21 AM PDT by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar said "Quae cum ita sunt. Since these things are so.".)
To: John Semmens
I’m cool with comedy and satire and such, but what I’ve seen of semi satire appears to be counterproductive
15 posted on
09/03/2012 11:52:16 AM PDT by
Figment
To: John Semmens
I feel that the old “Truth in Advertising” should apply to campaign ads. Of course, that will never happen.
16 posted on
09/03/2012 11:55:28 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: John Semmens
You know it’s good satire when you can HEAR Obama’s voice as you are reading it.
17 posted on
09/03/2012 12:07:16 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
( Lame and ill-informed post)
To: John Semmens
My free speech rights are perfect the way they are.
They allow me to say Hey obammy ya punk, F.You.
21 posted on
09/03/2012 12:38:45 PM PDT by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
To: John Semmens
I hate satire. Is it suppose to be funny? I never find it funny. I’m usually either disgusted or horrified by it.
To: John Semmens
John Semmens threads. Where you can see (some) Freepers in idiot mode. It’s embarassing! Read! Use brain!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson