I think you have that backwards. I may be wrong, but as I remember it:
1. The phrase “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” was not included on the original DNC certification to the 50 States.
2. Hawaii rejected that because they have a state law that requires the phrase/statement.
3. The Hawaii State DNC Chair refused to sign the new certification with the “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” statement, but would not give a reason.
4. The Hawaii AG and some other high ups got together and approved the certification without the required DNC Chair’s signature.
At least, that’s what I remember reading about on some threads here on FR. Here’s one of the original articles:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583
There are more, and FR has threads in the archives - about April-June, 2011.
If our own security services are so inept that they cannot find information on Obamas birth, then we have much bigger problems.
Just sayin.