Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Fed Just Killed the Agency (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) MBS Market
Confounded Interest ^ | 09/20.2012 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 09/20/2012 5:00:17 PM PDT by whitedog57

The market has taken several days to digest The Fed’s decision to continue Operation Twist and start purchasing $40 billion per month in agency mortgage-backed securities.

The MBS market thrives on uncertainty concerning future rates and prepayment speeds. When The Fed intentionally reduces mortgage rates through quantitative easing, it takes away one of the attractions of the MBS market: risk. Now agency MBS is pricing close to Treasuries.

Freddie Mac’s 30 year mortgage commitment rate fell to 3.49%, almost to a new low.

The spread between Fannie Mae current coupon and 10 year Treasury yields have fallen to 13.75 basis points!

In terms of bond risk, the volatility of 10 year Treasuries fell.

In terms of agency mortgage-backed security convexity, Fannie 4.5 and higher MBS are seeing convexities of -0.4 to -0.7. Lower coupon Fannies such as 3.0 and 3.5 are seeing much more negative convexities.

The Fannie 4.5 has seen a steady fall in convexity with Fed actions.

And the Fannie 3.5 is seeing a range of convexities based on interest rate paths, particularly at +100 basis points.

Talk about taking the starch out of the market! Now, agency MBS are pricing close to US Treasuries. Pretty soon, both Treasuries and Agency MBS will lose their luster with investors as such paltry yields.

(Excerpt) Read more at confoundedinterest.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bernanke; fanniemae; fed; freddiemac; inflation; mortgage
This guy said that The Fed just took the starch out of MBS, but they really killed it off. Now retirees and bond fund managers just lost another investment. Swine!
1 posted on 09/20/2012 5:00:25 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
MBS's were never an investment.

They were a cover for a Ponzi scheme. The sooner they die the better.

In a saner world the Fed wouldn't invest any taxpayer money in such worthless paper, but they are a quasi-governmental agency after all so they are only capable of quasi-intelligent/honest behavior.

2 posted on 09/20/2012 5:15:40 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
The sooner they die the better.

They will become the Undead.

Zombies.

The Fed will print fake money to pay them off with weak dollars.

3 posted on 09/20/2012 5:25:50 PM PDT by Palmetto Patriot (2010 All Over Again. Make it happen. Get Busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Kudos to the Freeper (I wish I remembered his/her screen name) who predicted several years ago that toxic mortgages were basically AAA-rated investments even though they were nothing more than paper of questionable value backing tens of thousands of homes whose mortgages were in default.

He/she said something to this effect: "The investors who bought them will eventually be made whole, just as they would if they had bought U.S. Treasuries."

Nobody believed him on that long-forgotten thread ... but damn, he was right!

4 posted on 09/20/2012 5:37:57 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Government dabbling in housing, education, industry and healthcare. What could possibly go wrong?


5 posted on 09/20/2012 5:39:04 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Collectivists don’t like the random way free market capitalism results in some ventures living and some dying.

They prefer to kill everything systematically.


6 posted on 09/20/2012 5:42:06 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Government income recipients/investors should be happy. The Fed’s paying the junk securities off with funny money. Ain’t the regime of recirculating debt magical?

Real estate’s going down for a very long time. My fellow Baby Boomers and I will be croaking for decades and leaving houses all over the country to rot.

Dump local regulations to allow men to build their homes and start making useful things. Then, you’ll see real investments and real, “sustainable” revenues.


7 posted on 09/20/2012 5:42:29 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot

Bingo.


8 posted on 09/20/2012 6:44:19 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Palmetto Patriot
I'm not sure this MBS-buying scheme is a good idea, but I think it's inaccurate to paint it as a "money-printing scheme."

If the Fed is buying mortgage-backed securities, then it's basically buying money that has already been printed when the mortgages that were bundled to create those securities were underwritten in the first place. That's how money is created, and "buying" these securities actually just insures that these mortgages -- no matter how sound they are -- will retain a certain face value over time.

9 posted on 09/20/2012 6:52:51 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

* The spread between Fannie Mae current coupon and 10 year Treasury yields have fallen to 13.75 basis points!*

Don’t know where they get this. I rate locked a 7 million dollar Fannie loan this week with a 196 spread.


10 posted on 09/20/2012 6:59:47 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

While the Fed is buying mortgages, I would take the opportunity to kill Fannie, Freddie, HUD, FHA, and all other federal housing agencies.


11 posted on 09/20/2012 7:27:10 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Shame you can’t arrest progressives for violating the “law of unintended consequences”! But then, they would all be in jail!


12 posted on 09/20/2012 8:24:54 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (You can never blame a progressive for a failure .... it's always the fault of someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"and "buying" these securities actually just insures that these mortgages -- no matter how sound they are -- will retain a certain face value over time."

The Fed is trying to drive down interest rates so construction and home improvement markets revive (employment). Achieving price stability for Mortgage Backed Securities is secondary.

Nothing the Fed does will prop up the housing market or the securities based on housing when they're pushing on a string. In order for MBS prices to remain at levels purchased, they need 1) their underlying assets to perform at their rated level, 2) continuous demand, and 3) a proper risk-reward ratio.

1) The Fed would have to violate GAAP rules for pricing to market to ensure MBS price stability, or

2) the Fed would have to inflate MBS prices through monetary policy to a degree that would crash the economy (too many individuals are on the edge of solvency already - any price shock will become a tipping point).

Problems

There's less demand for single-family housing (mortgages) based on long term demographics and there are millions of homes already declared in default, but the banks are not evicting residents because the inventory will rot and further depress prices if the banks try to clean out their large holding of non-performing assets.

Fannie and Freddie have assumed about 90% of the sub-prime and Alt-A market, so that time bomb is waiting to explode because both NGOs need major recapitalization. Fannie and Freddie’s primary missions are to provide a market for MBS. (Maybe they’ll park their garbage at the Fed since the Fed is even less transparent.)

If that's not enough, there's a giant problem obtaining a free and clear title for homes in default since MERS was used as a title clearing house and they didn't follow the proper legal process for transfer of title. This has created a logjam of litigation.

13 posted on 09/21/2012 7:59:52 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson