Posted on 09/24/2012 10:36:52 AM PDT by opentalk
Obama had to go campaign in reliably Blue state WI.
what a clever job of DVD pimping...
Turnout is key
Democrat turnout was MAXIMUM last time- so it cannot go up if it wanted to. Not for the first black president who turned out to be an incompetant muslim-loving communist HOMO (it said so right on Newsweek)
Republican turnout was LOW last time (McCain? ....eh), and this time it is ENERGIZED way up to vote for Notobamney
TURNOUT IS EVERYTHING
Jim Messina is now claiming “polls don’t matter” and that Obama is secretly winning. When a Democrat starts saying polls don’t matter, they are losing big time.”
I would add that anytime ANY candidate says “polls don’t matter” that means they are losing. I remember President Bush saying this in 1992 and how sick I felt. I knew then that he was definitely history. And he was.
This surprised me that they came out with this so early.
Obama had to go campaign in reliably Blue state WI.
///
great point!
...yet many still drink the kool-aid of the MSM and Rove.
when Obama will lose in a historic rejection,
maybe worse than Carter!
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Proof_that_Obama_has_rigged_the_November_2012_elections
Michelle Obama is out race-baiting referring to slavery”
You know, this is an interesting point. I think it might well be valid.
Basically, in 2008, if you think about their messaging (it is difficult to do, because it is so nauseating), but they really were about this sort of global peace, multicultural, we’re all in this together schtick. It wasn’t a black thang. The black vote was just there. It was sewn up.
Why are they doing this strategy this time? It wasn’t necessary in 2008...they were pursuing the middle.
Is it necessary now? Someone must have shown them some data to that effect, otherwise, they risk alienating the middle (which they have done) and losing the election.
So back to the starting point: I think michelle whipping up the black vote might well be a significant data point. Note: Bill Clinton never had to do this, either. He just had it. He went from there so the Sister S moment and that got him enough of the middle to win.....
We only watched the very end of the DNC Convention, when Bath-House Barry was speaking...my better half couldn’t get over the expression of depression on Manchelle’s face during Barry’s speech.
It’s like she already knows they are going to lose.
Hillbuzz is usually kind of “out there”, but I completely concur with them on all these points. If Obama was winning he wouldn’t be doing things like The View, and multiple trips to Letterman.
Obama is in trouble. He is going to lose in November.
My fear is that the swelled ranks of the permanent welfare class will eventually propel Obama to victory... and that coupled with the fact that Romney does not exude the kind of confidence that make his chances certain makes my almost emotionally unstable. In my mind, I am going through the motions of emotional adjustment in case Obama wins.
Nope, The View is totally Obama’s base. What in the world is he doing on that show at this point in the campaign? And why in the world would Michelle even have to think about ginning up the Black vote?
Bye, bye, Obama.
.. if their polls show a tight race going to the election, voter fraud would be easier for them to fly under the radar.
What is happening at HotAir and RedState? Are they whining and throwing in the towel??
Welfare recipients vote on Nov 7th...
Obama's America 2016, may have made a dent
Let’s not forget www.unskewedpolls.com with Romney up an average of 7.8%
Brilliant piece. Thank you.
While I hope for such a resounding repudiation of 0; remember, Romney is NO Reagan!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.