I’ve been hearing this word ‘oversampling’ a lot lately, which reminds me of the time I oversampled in Napa Valley, California. But isn’t it true that more citizens of this veil of tears register as Democrats than as Republicans?
Risking credibility with the knowledge they and their surrogates can be agents provacateur both during and after election day, crowing incessantly about poor, disenfranchised morons and the evil Tea Party voters. They will work at promoting fraud behind the scenes while covering it up in the public arena. Their credibility depends on it.
I wouldn’t be too sure of the premise that pollsters’ credibility ride on the election results. Nate Silver and the MSM widely discredit Rasmussen, despite Ras nailing 2008 and 2010. The consumer is always right, and the consumer is the MSM.
Dem voters take notice:
It’s over.
The election will be a landslide for O’Bozo.
No need to drop the bong, stop chooming or stop trolling for gays just to go vote against Romney.
You can stay home on election day - just watch ABC, NBC, CBS or MSNBC and CNN - your side has already won.
Frankly, I don’t think they count the votes. I really don’t. The polls are intended to lay the groundwork for the desired outcome. It’a already a done deal.
The so called skewing is an indication that the polls have an error in methodology that they are not getting random responses.
What possibilities would cause this?
Is there some natural demographic that would skew results?
Could a common phone number list be skewed by avoiding typical republican geographic areas.
Is there a common denominator on allocating phone numbers resulting in more democrats getting phone numbers than republicans?
Could those making the calls or those tallying results be infiltrated ?
They completely underestimated republican turnout in 2010, and then have spent the last two years trying to forget it! Now we are being told that republican turnout in 2012 won’t be anywhere near 2010, and in fact the Dims are going to show up in numbers bigger than 2008!
Okay, so a significant number of those republicans who were mad as hell in 2010 are just going to stay home and pass on a chance to fire Zero because they don’t like Romney? Yeah, right.
The pollsters have nightmares about the 2010 turnout levels being applied to their crap polls. In that scenario they get a Romney landslide.
Bring it on!
All I hear is how Outrageous the Bias is this time around by the Main Stream Media,what do you expect ,the debt is at Levels never envisioned in History,Unemployment,Foreign Policy Melt down,How the Hell else are you going to Sucker the Americans to Buy this Huckster again?
Now of course the Republicans have sure given you more than an Even shot at pulling it off with their Charisma Challenged Candidate so let it ride.
Romney is the Gawkiest Candidate I have seen since Hubert Humphrey. Romneys best hope is that the TV picture is Cloudy when they Debate,his Smirks and choppy Gestures with his head make him look so awkward he is hard to look at.
I remember when Kennedy and Nixon debated,people listening on the Radio said Nixon won,those watching on TV said Kennedy won. I think this may be the same.
IMHO that fact that we have to depend on a Good Performance in a Debate with this Communists Record only says we Have already Lost,I will Not be Watching the First debate anyway,I will Be where it really counts ,Bible study at Church.