War BY women follows the pattern of affirmative racism

Flopping Aces ^ | 09-30-12 | Alec Rawls

[Starman417]

The Democrats have always been the party of racism. Long after fighting on the wrong side of the Civil War, they provided the bulk of the opposition to the civil rights movement and the ending of the web of Jim Crow segregation laws. Then as soon as they lost the battle for anti-black racism the party immediately switched to anti-white racism with its embrace of affirmative action (the race-conscious favoring of blacks in hiring and promotion). Their one constant: they never gave liberty a chance.

Now they are following the same path with feminism. "If you don't buy me $18,000 worth of birth control it's a WAR AGAINST WOMEN," says Sandra Fluke and her sponsors in the Obama campaign:

Sorry girls but trying to force taxpayers to provide for your outsized birth-control consumption is a war BY women, and yes, this really is politics as a substitute for war because the issue is force. That is what laws do. They use the state's monopoly on force to coerce individual behavior. Sandra and her ilk are trying to achieve a tyrannous majority, trampling the rights of others, grabbing other peoples' stuff for themselves.

But there is a problem even for the Sandra Flukes of the world with using the Orwellian language of "war on women" for a war by women. When you accommodate to these perversions of language it becomes impossible to think straight about the issues involved. Remember the wisdom of Confucius: "When words lose their meaning, people lose their liberty." That is doubly true when the words whose meanings get perverted are our words for liberty, and liberty is important even for women.

Democrat discombobulation over liberty is evident in another of barackobama.com's e-cards for women. Check out this woman-voiced claim that "control of our own health care" comes from submitting to the paternalistic system of government-run medicine that is Obama-care:

Are Democrat women actually stupid enough to fall for this? Do they really think that having government choose what health care they receive will give them more control than when they were free to choose their health care for themselves?

(excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...

[Tublecane]

No, woman Democrats are not that stupid. They nevertheless vote Democrat; draw what conclusions from that about their intelligence you will.

[Squawk 8888]

I think it would benefit the gene pool if we provide Sandra Fluke with plenty of free birth control, whether she wants it or not.

[uncommonsense]

We must control people in order to make them free.

[happyhomemaker]

What has been lost in this conversation about birth control is that most mothers(and fathers) would like to have their daughters remain virgins until marriage and in that case would not even been in the need of birth control. By having a note like that in a Dem Ad it is telling me that Dems assume moms are thrilled to hear about their daughter’s out of wedlock sex live and that the guy/guys they are having sex with are to broke to pay for the BC.

[Aleya2Fairlie]

A war “by women”. I totally agree. However, not all of us are so mentally challenged that we don’t see this as a farther degradation of women’s worth as anything other than sex objects.

What man wouldn’t secretly like to see a nation full of women with unlimited birth control and no self control? Sandra Fluke is the absolute darling of the Liberal Progessive male sector as well as the featherheaded feminists.