Skip to comments.U.S. Jobs Deficit Sticks at 11.6 Million in October
Posted on 11/03/2012 5:52:26 PM PDT by NaturalBornConservative
32 Years from Full-Employment
- By: Larry Walker, Jr. -
In the fairest sense, the U.S. Jobs Deficit has improved by an average of 30,000 jobs per month since January 1, 2011. And although this may be good enough for indifferent Obama loyalists, what it really means is that based on Barack Obamas very best job creation averages to date, full employment is still another 32 years away. Based on yesterdays Employment Situation Report, 171,000 nonfarm jobs were added in the month of October. However, since the U.S. needs to add a minimum of 320,850 jobs each and every month for the next 60 months in order to return to full-employment, Octobers result fell short of the mark by 149,850.
When the entire Obama record is analyzed, it turns out that U.S. employers have only added a total of 194,000 nonfarm jobs since February 1, 2009 (133,755,000 133,561,000). The jobs deficit has increased by 5,521,000 during Barack Obamas 45-month term, from 6,110,000 on January 31, 2009 to 11,631,000 on October 31, 2012. The average number of nonfarm jobs created on a monthly basis in 2012 is 157,000, which is ironically the same as in 2011. In contrast, the average number of jobs created in 2010 was 86,000, compared to an average loss of (422,000) per month in 2009.
So an average of 157,000 jobs a month, over the past 22 months, is the best that Barack Obamas policies have been able to accomplish. This may sound great to some folks, but since 127,000 new jobs are required each and every month just to keep pace with population growth, what it really means is that we are clearly locked on a trajectory that chips away at the present 11,631,000 jobs deficit by a mere 30,000 jobs per month. So what does this mean in plain English? In other words, how many jobs must the U.S. create each and every month going forward in order to reach full-employment, and how long will it take?
Updated Jobs Benchmark
Updating Paul Krugmans original benchmark with the latest figures, we discover that to be meaningful, the number of jobs needed to return to more or less full employment by December of 2014 (the original target date), or within the next 26 months, is now 574,346 jobs a month, as follows:
In order to keep up with population growth, we would need to create 127,000 jobs times 26 months, or 3,302,000. Add in the need to make up for the jobs deficit and were at around 14,933,000 (3,302,000 + 11,631,000) over the next 26 months or 574,346 jobs a month.
But since thats never going to happen under the countermanding policies of Barack Obama, we are forced to extend the time frame. However, even when we extend the target date to 5 years from today, which will be more than 8 years from the time the recession ended, the number of jobs needed to return to more or less full employment by October of 2017, or within the next 60 months, is now 320,850 jobs a month, as follows:
In order to keep up with population growth, we would need to create 127,000 jobs times 60 months, or 7,620,000. Add in the need to make up for the jobs deficit and were at around 19,251,000 (7,620,000 + 11,631,000) over the next 60 months or 320,850 jobs a month.
Did the U.S. add 574,346 jobs last month? No. Did we add 320,850? No. In fact, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. has only added 194,000 nonfarm jobs since Obama took office (i.e. February 1, 2009) (see related table). So what does that tell you? It tells me that Barack Obamas economic policies have failed miserably. Hes the one who said, If I dont have this done in three years, then theres going to be a one-term proposition. So dont blame conservatives and independents when the earth slides from under his feet on Tuesday.
In the fairest sense, when we average the number of jobs created over the last 10 months, we arrive at 157,000 a month. And when we average the number created in 2011 we ironically get 157,000 as well. Do the math. So in other words, there has not been any improvement this year over last year. So were not moving forward after all, were stuck in neutral. And since we know that it takes a minimum of 127,000 jobs a month just to keep up with population growth, we are only chipping away at the 11,631,000 jobs deficit by 30,000 jobs a month (157,000 127,000). Thus, on the current trajectory, full-employment is roughly 388 months or 32 years away.
[For the mathematically challenged, take the jobs deficit of 11,631,000 and divide it by the twenty-two month average improvement of 30,000, and you get 388 months. Now divide 388 months by 12 and you get 32 years.]
So four more years of Obamas trickle-down-government approach places us on the track to reach full-employment by around the year 2044. And thats giving him the benefit of the highest job creation averages achieved during his entire presidency. Ill be 84 years old by then, and my one year old twin granddaughters will be 33. Im sorry, but no matter how you spin the numbers, Barack Obama isnt worthy of a second term.
Until the number of Nonfarm jobs is expanding by a minimum of 320,850 a month for a sustained period of at least five years, anything short is bad news. The Romney-Ryan Team is the only one on the ballot with a plan targeted to come anywhere close to whats needed. Aside from that, with the national debt already beginning its ascent towards $20 trillion, with 25 million Americans unemployed or underemployed, with the Federal Reserve devaluing our currency by printing money to purchase mortgage-backed debt on an unlimited basis, with our tax and regulatory structure mired in uncertainty, with a foreign policy meltdown, and with the price of gasoline hovering above $3.25 for a record 86 consecutive weeks, there is absolutely, positively, no reason to consider a second Obama term. None!
[Note: Paul Krugman and other left-wing cronies are now trying to push the idea that, since July 2011 only 90,000 jobs have been required to keep up with population growth. The number used to be higher, but baby boomers are getting old the same thing that affects the household survey. However, even if such a radical 30% shift had occurred within the last four years, it would only alter the current jobs deficit by a diminimus amount 592,000 jobs, from 11,631,000 to 11,039,000. And this would only alter the 60-month benchmark from a requirement of 320,850 jobs a month, to 310,983, so phooey! Theres no turning back now, we're sticking with the original benchmark which Mr. Krugman laid out in December of 2009.]
Worksheet on Google Drive
U.S. Jobs Deficit Improves by 1,000 in September
U.S. Jobs Deficit Increases by 72,000 in August
U.S. Jobs Deficit Holds at 11,760,000 in July
U.S. Jobs Deficit Grows by 47,000 in June
The Real Jobs Deficit | Moving in the wrong direction.
Obama Jobs Scorecard, Part 3 | The American Dream
Three more days
So is this what we have to show for hundreds of billions of Obama's "stimulus" dollars, that we borrowed and still have to pay back?
That’s it, $5.3 trillion in new debt, and our first credit downgrade ever, in exchange for 194,000 temporary part-time jobs, and a big mouthed blowhard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.