Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/01/2013 7:18:13 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cotton1706
Once again we the people have been treated to a dog and pony show of last minute brinkmanship with both sides fighting valiantly for their ideals.

I have been watching the stock market and it seems that the investors knew since Thursday how this would turn out.
I guess we all knew. In the end both sides agreed to raise taxes now and deal with the spending problem later.

2 posted on 01/01/2013 7:31:20 AM PST by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
The House TEA Party caucus is going to demand “tax cuts” for EVERYBODY or else the Dems will have to help the RINOs (who will be primaried out on their asses in 2014) pass this Marxist monstrosity.
4 posted on 01/01/2013 7:51:54 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Outlawing guns because of Adam Lanza would be like outlawing free speech because of Bill Maher.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
Goodbye Bush tax cuts...Hello Obama tax cuts. Hooray for Obama the Great! </s>
5 posted on 01/01/2013 7:54:00 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

The coming tax revolt of 2014 is going to dwarf the mid-term election success of the Tea Party from 2010.


7 posted on 01/01/2013 7:56:24 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Britt Hume has been tweeting that line of crap all day long.


11 posted on 01/01/2013 3:07:43 PM PST by j_tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

By that argument, the bush tax cuts weren’t really tax cuts at all — after all, Bush Sr. raised taxes, and Clinton raised them even more, so it was just the cowardly guys who did nothing more than reverse the legal tax increases in place at the time.

Of course, if you really want to take that argument to it’s logical conclusion, there has never been a tax cut, since before the 16th amendment was passed, there was no income tax at all. Ever since then, it’s just been cowardly people pretending to “cut taxes” when they are really simply voting for slightly smaller “tax increases” over the previous rate of 0%.

Would you rather we keep these new taxes for a couple of years? How many years do we have to suffer before we get to count a tax cut as a tax cut?


12 posted on 01/01/2013 6:47:22 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson