No, the question IS a falacy. Since there is no meaning in the result, there is no pupose to the question or research other than to delay or deflect the argument.
The “right to bear arms” is exactly that, and an empty magazine is not arms.
Besides, there are better questions that this stupid falacy keeps us from asking.
Can we remain an armed and free people as the Founders intended while whole generations of little boys are doped out if their minds for the convenience of “public school teachers” to enjoy a classroom filled with quiet zombies?
Can we lose psychiatry as a medicine and psychology as a science to the Alinsky-left and still be a nation of people we would like to see armed?
Those are REAL questions that are NOT being asked while we are lead by our noses through the Democrat’s debate.
Please see my #51. This is similar to the gun-grabbers saying you don’t need 20 rounds for hunting. Anyone that hunts, knows this is true, you really don’t...unless you’re trying to shoot doves, then you need fully auto.
Even though well-intentioned, if we keep saying we need large capacity mags for home defense the only data on that shows it to not be true a majority of the time, it weakens our position and I don’t want that. The media will ping on that as a fact. I don’t want our only defense to be...because I may need it.