Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

>>We have been subjected to this argument for years and I’ve heard that stupid, liberal quote any number of times.<<

How’s that obozocare workin’ for ya? And the locks on your guns are pretty useless against the Feds and his immaculatory term II (handcuffs off).

Good work last November!

Now you’ll get an ultra-lib instead of a RINO that can be controlled.

Your anger shows your inner remorse.

Note: if there is someone better (like, oh say my local guy CRUZ!!!! who I worked for and voted for even when they said he could not win) do the work.

But given obozo vs. Romney in C minor, vote Romney, not obozo — the latter which is what staying at home or 3P did.


37 posted on 01/22/2013 9:03:08 AM PST by freedumb2003 (lib "think": My bumper sticker didn't go into details about that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

Your way of thinking is how we end up with people like Romney, who lose, and Brown, who lose.

Conservatives literally supported everybody BUT Romney last year. But the powers that be said it must be Romney. Only Romney can win. He’ll get the independents. He’ll get the Reagan democrats. We can’t go for broke with a real conservative. It’s far too risky. We can’t dare nominate Palin or Cain or Bachmann or Santorum, or Perry, or God forbid, somebody who actually attacks the media and the democrats and causes people to get to their feet in cheers and go to the polls in droves, Newt Gingrich. Oh, no. The perfect is the enemy of the good. We must nominate the most moderate man we can find. We must destroy every conservative that gets in his way. And THEN, we can count on the conservatives to vote for whomever we nominate because they have nowhere else to go.

How many times do you think people will fall for this same trap? This same song that the republican establishment has been singing since Hoover’s defeat? We can’t have Taft, we’ll nominate Willkie. We can’t have Taft, we’ll nominate Dewey. And then we’ll nominate him again. We can’t have Taft, we’ll nominate Eisenhower. Nixon could win with Goldwater as VP but nope, we’ll get Nixon to choose Lodge. Damn, Goldwater somehow won the nomination so we’ll work to defeat him. Now that he’s defeated, we can go back to our old game. Nixon again. We can’t have Reagan, we must renominate Ford. We can’t have Reagan, we’ll support Bush. Thank God Reagan’s done. Now we can have Bush. Too bad Bush was defeated, we’ll nominate Dole. Oh, good, another Bush, but we’d rather have McCain. Oh, good, now we can nominate McCain. And then Romney. And who will be next? Who will be the next nominee that the republican party will force upon us and expect then demand that we vote for because there’s nowhere else to go.

I and a lot of others are not playing the game anymore. We’ll vote for conservatives or we’ll stay home or leave our ballots blank. Because the moderates will either lose or get elected to screw us over just as the democrats would. The answer is to not support moderate republicans ever and support only conservatives all the way down the line. I’ll work to support any real conservative and will work to defeat any moderate.


38 posted on 01/22/2013 9:38:59 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson