To: Reaganite Republican
Any good duck load will be sufficient!
6 posted on
02/12/2013 3:55:09 AM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Or maybe even a Frisbee lol
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Would not be too hard to build an anti-drone RC vehicle.
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Did not take them long to ban lead shot on these things....dang EPA.
I am never going to be able to use up this 800 lbs of lead shot in my life time.
18 posted on
02/12/2013 4:14:50 AM PST by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
To: SWAMPSNIPER; Jonty30
Since video cameras would be the first element of its payload, a duck load would identify the person who shot it down. However, I've got to believe that those cameras aren't looking up. The lack of hemispherical situational awareness of the operator is my chief argument against them being allowed to operate above 500 ft AGL. $50-60 will get you a sacrificial RC helo that could try to land on top of the offending voyeur ("Peeping Tom" for those of you in Rio Lindo). Not that I would ever do such a destructive thing, of course. Merely speculating what could happen.
23 posted on
02/12/2013 4:31:19 AM PST by
Pecos
(If more sane people carried guns, fewer crazies would get off a second shot.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Any good duck load will be sufficient!I used to be pretty good at tossing playing cards across the room into the basket. And flicking bottle caps, too. Maybe I should sharpen back up. (No law against those - yet).
I might not be able to hit a hi-flyer, but if they start sending them within reach.....
39 posted on
02/12/2013 4:58:00 AM PST by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Any good duck load will be sufficient! **************
WE HAVE A WIN-N-A-A-A-H-H-H-HH!!!!
53 posted on
02/12/2013 5:47:06 AM PST by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson